Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is $0.15 cheaper per 1M input tokens (50% lower; 2x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
Pick Qwen3.8 Omni Flash when budget and context both matter.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Qwen3.8 Omni Flash when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is estimated at $0.39 vs $0.9 for Muse Glimmer 30B, saving $0.51 (57.2% lower).
Cost-first pickQwen3.8 Omni Flash
Context-first pickQwen3.8 Omni Flash
Sample savings$0.5157.2%
10x traffic gap$5.15
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $5.15. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | $0.98 | $2.1 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | $0.62 | $1.5 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | $2.5 | $6.3 |
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is $0.73 cheaper per 1M output tokens (60.8% lower; 2.55x difference).
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has 868.93K more context (7.63x larger).
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is $0.51 cheaper on the standard workload (57.2% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has the lower input price; Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has the lower output price; Qwen3.8 Omni Flash offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.39 for Qwen3.8 Omni Flash and $0.9 for Muse Glimmer 30B.
Choose Qwen3.8 Omni Flash when you care most about lower input-token price, lower output-token price, and larger context window.
Choose Muse Glimmer 30B when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is estimated at $0.39 vs $0.9 for Muse Glimmer 30B, saving $0.51 (57.2% lower).
- Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is $0.51 cheaper on the standard workload (57.2% lower).
- Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is $0.15 cheaper per 1M input tokens (50% lower; 2x difference).
- Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is $0.73 cheaper per 1M output tokens (60.8% lower; 2.55x difference).
- Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has 868.93K more context (7.63x larger).
| Feature | NewQwen3.8 Omni Flash (Qwen) | Muse Glimmer 30B (Meta) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.15 | $0.3 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.47 | $1.2 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.39 | $0.9 |
| Context Window | 1M | 131.07K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is estimated at $0.39 vs $0.9 for Muse Glimmer 30B, saving $0.51 (57.2% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Qwen3.8 27B (free) can replace Qwen3.8 Omni Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct (free) can replace Qwen3.8 Omni Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (free) can replace Qwen3.8 Omni Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Qwen3.7 Flash can replace Qwen3.8 Omni Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
- GLM 5.3 Flash offers 1.31M context with $0.4 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.36 sample workload cost.
- GLM Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.43 sample workload cost.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro · Xiaomi · #1
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) · Qwen · #2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · DeepSeek · #3
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsQwen catalog
Review all tracked Qwen models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Qwen modelsMeta catalog
Check other Meta models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Meta modelsQwen3.8 Omni Flash is an omni-modal reasoning model from Alibaba, the first Qwen model built around agentic capabilities with native audio-video understanding. It is suited for audio-video analysis and summarization,...
Muse Glimmer 30B is a dense, open-weight multimodal model from Meta Superintelligence Labs, distilled from Muse Spark and optimized for autonomous agents on consumer hardware. It is suited for long-horizon...