DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest is $0.12 cheaper per 1M input tokens (80% lower; 5x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest
Pick Qwen3.8 Omni Flash for lower cost; pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Qwen3.8 Omni Flash for lower cost; pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is estimated at $0.39 vs $0.43 for DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest, saving $0.05 (10.5% lower).
Cost-first pickQwen3.8 Omni Flash
Context-first pickDeepSeek V4 Flash Latest
Sample savings$0.0510.5%
10x traffic gap$0.45
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest has more context, but Qwen3.8 Omni Flash saves $0.05 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.45. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest, balanced workload favors Qwen3.8 Omni Flash, and output-heavy chatbot favors Qwen3.8 Omni Flash.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest | $0.98 | $0.55 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | $0.62 | $0.83 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | $2.5 | $4.03 |
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is $0.33 cheaper per 1M output tokens (41.3% lower; 1.7x difference).
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest has 310.72K more context (1.31x larger).
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is $0.05 cheaper on the standard workload (10.5% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest has the lower input price; Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has the lower output price; DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.39 for Qwen3.8 Omni Flash and $0.43 for DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest.
Choose Qwen3.8 Omni Flash when you care most about lower output-token price.
Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest when you care most about lower input-token price, and larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is estimated at $0.39 vs $0.43 for DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest, saving $0.05 (10.5% lower).
- Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is $0.05 cheaper on the standard workload (10.5% lower).
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest is $0.12 cheaper per 1M input tokens (80% lower; 5x difference).
- Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is $0.33 cheaper per 1M output tokens (41.3% lower; 1.7x difference).
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest has 310.72K more context (1.31x larger).
| Feature | NewQwen3.8 Omni Flash (Qwen) | DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest (DeepSeek) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.15 | $0.03 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.47 | $0.8 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.39 | $0.43 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1.31M |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is estimated at $0.39 vs $0.43 for DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest, saving $0.05 (10.5% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Qwen3.8 27B (free) can replace Qwen3.8 Omni Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct (free) can replace Qwen3.8 Omni Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (free) can replace Qwen3.8 Omni Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Qwen3.7 Flash can replace Qwen3.8 Omni Flash when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
- No larger-context model is currently tracked within a close sample-cost band.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro · Xiaomi · #1
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) · Qwen · #2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · DeepSeek · #3
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsQwen catalog
Review all tracked Qwen models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Qwen modelsDeepSeek catalog
Check other DeepSeek models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open DeepSeek modelsQwen3.8 Omni Flash is an omni-modal reasoning model from Alibaba, the first Qwen model built around agentic capabilities with native audio-video understanding. It is suited for audio-video analysis and summarization,...
This model always redirects to the latest model in the DeepSeek V4 Flash family.