Solar Pro 4 is $1.97 cheaper per 1M input tokens (98.5% lower; 66.7x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewQwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Solar Pro 4
Pick Solar Pro 4 for lower cost; pick Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Solar Pro 4 for lower cost; pick Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Solar Pro 4 is estimated at $0.09 vs $5 for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B, saving $4.91 (98.2% lower).
Cost-first pickSolar Pro 4
Context-first pickQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Sample savings$4.9198.2%
10x traffic gap$49.1
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has more context, but Solar Pro 4 saves $4.91 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $49.1. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Solar Pro 4 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Solar Pro 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Solar Pro 4 | $13 | $0.21 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Solar Pro 4 | $8 | $0.15 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Solar Pro 4 | $32 | $0.63 |
Solar Pro 4 is $5.88 cheaper per 1M output tokens (98% lower; 50x difference).
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has 524.29K more context (2x larger).
Solar Pro 4 is $4.91 cheaper on the standard workload (98.2% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Solar Pro 4 has the lower input price; Solar Pro 4 has the lower output price; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Solar Pro 4 is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $5 for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and $0.09 for Solar Pro 4.
Choose Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B when you care most about larger context window.
Choose Solar Pro 4 when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Solar Pro 4 is estimated at $0.09 vs $5 for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B, saving $4.91 (98.2% lower).
- Solar Pro 4 is $4.91 cheaper on the standard workload (98.2% lower).
- Solar Pro 4 is $1.97 cheaper per 1M input tokens (98.5% lower; 66.7x difference).
- Solar Pro 4 is $5.88 cheaper per 1M output tokens (98% lower; 50x difference).
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has 524.29K more context (2x larger).
| Feature | NewQwen3.8 2.4T A95B (Qwen) | Solar Pro 4 (Upstage) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $2 | $0.03 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $6 | $0.12 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $5 | $0.09 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 524.29K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Solar Pro 4 | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Solar Pro 4 is estimated at $0.09 vs $5 for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B, saving $4.91 (98.2% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Solar Pro 4 | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Solar Pro 4 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct (free) can replace Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (free) can replace Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Qwen3.7 Flash can replace Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
- Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 can replace Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.14.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.17 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.11 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · DeepSeek · #1
- MiMo-V2.5 · Xiaomi · #2
- Hy3 · Tencent · #3
- Ox Alpha · stealth · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsQwen catalog
Review all tracked Qwen models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Qwen modelsUpstage catalog
Check other Upstage models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Upstage modelsQwen3.8 2.4T A95B is an open-weight sparse mixture-of-experts model from Qwen and the open-weight variant of [Qwen3.8 Max](/qwen/qwen3.8-max), with 95 billion active parameters out of 2.4 trillion total. It is...
Solar Pro 4 is Upstage's cost-efficient large language model, featuring a 524K context window. It is built for long-horizon tasks and agentic workflows, with strong capabilities in office productivity, document-intensive...