Qwen3.5 397B A17B is $0.01 cheaper per 1M input tokens (2.5% lower; 1.03x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs GPT-4.1 Mini
Pick GPT-4.1 Mini when budget and context both matter.
Budget verdict
Pick GPT-4.1 Mini when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-4.1 Mini is estimated at $1.2 vs $1.56 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B, saving $0.36 (23.1% lower).
GPT-4.1 Mini is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $3.6. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
GPT-4.1 Mini stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Qwen3.5 397B A17B | GPT-4.1 Mini |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | GPT-4.1 Mini | $3.12 | $2.8 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | GPT-4.1 Mini | $2.73 | $2 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | GPT-4.1 Mini | $12.09 | $8.4 |
GPT-4.1 Mini is $0.74 cheaper per 1M output tokens (31.6% lower; 1.46x difference).
GPT-4.1 Mini has 785.43K more context (4x larger).
GPT-4.1 Mini is $0.36 cheaper on the standard workload (23.1% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Qwen3.5 397B A17B has the lower input price; GPT-4.1 Mini has the lower output price; GPT-4.1 Mini offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, GPT-4.1 Mini is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $1.56 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and $1.2 for GPT-4.1 Mini.
Choose Qwen3.5 397B A17B when you care most about lower input-token price.
Choose GPT-4.1 Mini when you care most about lower output-token price, and larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-4.1 Mini is estimated at $1.2 vs $1.56 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B, saving $0.36 (23.1% lower).
- GPT-4.1 Mini is $0.36 cheaper on the standard workload (23.1% lower).
- Qwen3.5 397B A17B is $0.01 cheaper per 1M input tokens (2.5% lower; 1.03x difference).
- GPT-4.1 Mini is $0.74 cheaper per 1M output tokens (31.6% lower; 1.46x difference).
- GPT-4.1 Mini has 785.43K more context (4x larger).
| Feature | Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Qwen) | GPT-4.1 Mini (OpenAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.39 | $0.4 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $2.34 | $1.6 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $1.56 | $1.2 |
| Context Window | 262.14K | 1.05M |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #49 | #52 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | GPT-4.1 Mini | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-4.1 Mini is estimated at $1.2 vs $1.56 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B, saving $0.36 (23.1% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Qwen3.5 397B A17B | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | GPT-4.1 Mini | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | GPT-4.1 Mini | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct (free) can replace Qwen3.5 397B A17B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (free) can replace Qwen3.5 397B A17B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct can replace Qwen3.5 397B A17B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.09.
- Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 can replace Qwen3.5 397B A17B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.14.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.25 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- MiMo-V2.5 offers 1.05M context with $0.28 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- MiMo-V2.5 · Xiaomi · #3
- MiniMax M3 · MiniMax · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsQwen catalog
Review all tracked Qwen models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Qwen modelsOpenAI catalog
Check other OpenAI models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open OpenAI modelsThe Qwen3.5 series 397B-A17B native vision-language model is built on a hybrid architecture that integrates a linear attention mechanism with a sparse mixture-of-experts model, achieving higher inference efficiency. It delivers...
GPT-4.1 Mini is a mid-sized model delivering performance competitive with GPT-4o at substantially lower latency and cost. It retains a 1 million token context window and scores 45.1% on hard...