Ring-2.6-1T is $0.32 cheaper per 1M input tokens (80.8% lower; 5.2x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs NewRing-2.6-1T
Pick Ring-2.6-1T when budget is the priority.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Ring-2.6-1T when budget is the priority.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Ring-2.6-1T is estimated at $0.39 vs $1.56 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B, saving $1.17 (75.2% lower).
Cost-first pickRing-2.6-1T
Context-first pickBoth models
Sample savings$1.1775.2%
10x traffic gap$11.73
The reported context window is tied, so cost and provider fit carry more weight. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $11.73. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Ring-2.6-1T stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Qwen3.5 397B A17B | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Ring-2.6-1T | $3.12 | $0.69 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Ring-2.6-1T | $2.73 | $0.7 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Ring-2.6-1T | $12.09 | $3.2 |
Ring-2.6-1T is $1.71 cheaper per 1M output tokens (73.3% lower; 3.74x difference).
Both models report the same context window at 262.14K tokens.
Ring-2.6-1T is $1.17 cheaper on the standard workload (75.2% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Ring-2.6-1T has the lower input price; Ring-2.6-1T has the lower output price; both models report the same context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Ring-2.6-1T is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $1.56 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and $0.39 for Ring-2.6-1T.
Choose Qwen3.5 397B A17B when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
Choose Ring-2.6-1T when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Ring-2.6-1T is estimated at $0.39 vs $1.56 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B, saving $1.17 (75.2% lower).
- Ring-2.6-1T is $1.17 cheaper on the standard workload (75.2% lower).
- Ring-2.6-1T is $0.32 cheaper per 1M input tokens (80.8% lower; 5.2x difference).
- Ring-2.6-1T is $1.71 cheaper per 1M output tokens (73.3% lower; 3.74x difference).
- Both models report the same context window at 262.14K tokens.
| Feature | Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Qwen) | NewRing-2.6-1T (inclusionAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.39 | $0.075 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $2.34 | $0.625 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $1.56 | $0.39 |
| Context Window | 262.14K | 262.14K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #53 | #64 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Ring-2.6-1T | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Ring-2.6-1T is estimated at $0.39 vs $1.56 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B, saving $1.17 (75.2% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Ring-2.6-1T | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Ring-2.6-1T | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Tie | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct (free) can replace Qwen3.5 397B A17B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (free) can replace Qwen3.5 397B A17B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct can replace Qwen3.5 397B A17B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.09.
- Qwen3.5-9B can replace Qwen3.5 397B A17B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.11.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro offers 1.05M context with $0.87 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsQwen catalog
Review all tracked Qwen models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Qwen modelsinclusionAI catalog
Check other inclusionAI models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open inclusionAI modelsThe Qwen3.5 series 397B-A17B native vision-language model is built on a hybrid architecture that integrates a linear attention mechanism with a sparse mixture-of-experts model, achieving higher inference efficiency. It delivers...
Ring-2.6-1T is a 1T-parameter-scale thinking model with 63B active parameters, built for real-world agent workflows that require both strong capability and operational efficiency. It is optimized for coding agents, tool...