Qwen3.5-27B is $0.06 cheaper per 1M input tokens (22.6% lower; 1.29x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Qwen3.5-27B vs DeepSeek V3.2
Pick DeepSeek V3.2 for lower cost; pick Qwen3.5-27B only if the larger context window matters more.
Pricing data updated:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick DeepSeek V3.2 for lower cost; pick Qwen3.5-27B only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, DeepSeek V3.2 is estimated at $0.44 vs $0.98 for Qwen3.5-27B, saving $0.53 (54.8% lower).
Cost-first pickDeepSeek V3.2
Context-first pickQwen3.5-27B
Sample savings$0.5354.8%
10x traffic gap$5.34
Qwen3.5-27B has more context, but DeepSeek V3.2 saves $0.53 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $5.34. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
DeepSeek V3.2 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Qwen3.5-27B | DeepSeek V3.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | DeepSeek V3.2 | $1.75 | $1.45 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | DeepSeek V3.2 | $1.76 | $0.63 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | DeepSeek V3.2 | $8 | $2.14 |
DeepSeek V3.2 is $1.18 cheaper per 1M output tokens (75.8% lower; 4.13x difference).
Qwen3.5-27B has 131.07K more context (2x larger).
DeepSeek V3.2 is $0.53 cheaper on the standard workload (54.8% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Qwen3.5-27B has the lower input price; DeepSeek V3.2 has the lower output price; Qwen3.5-27B offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, DeepSeek V3.2 is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.98 for Qwen3.5-27B and $0.44 for DeepSeek V3.2.
Choose Qwen3.5-27B when you care most about lower input-token price, and larger context window.
Choose DeepSeek V3.2 when you care most about lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, DeepSeek V3.2 is estimated at $0.44 vs $0.98 for Qwen3.5-27B, saving $0.53 (54.8% lower).
- DeepSeek V3.2 is $0.53 cheaper on the standard workload (54.8% lower).
- Qwen3.5-27B is $0.06 cheaper per 1M input tokens (22.6% lower; 1.29x difference).
- DeepSeek V3.2 is $1.18 cheaper per 1M output tokens (75.8% lower; 4.13x difference).
- Qwen3.5-27B has 131.07K more context (2x larger).
| Feature | Qwen3.5-27B (Qwen) | DeepSeek V3.2 (DeepSeek) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.195 | $0.252 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $1.56 | $0.378 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.98 | $0.44 |
| Context Window | 262.14K | 131.07K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | DeepSeek V3.2 | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, DeepSeek V3.2 is estimated at $0.44 vs $0.98 for Qwen3.5-27B, saving $0.53 (54.8% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Qwen3.5-27B | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | DeepSeek V3.2 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Qwen3.5-27B | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct (free) can replace Qwen3.5-27B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (free) can replace Qwen3.5-27B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct can replace Qwen3.5-27B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.09.
- Qwen3.5-9B can replace Qwen3.5-27B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.11.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite offers 1.05M context with $1 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro offers 1.05M context with $0.87 sample workload cost.
- No popular competitor is currently available.
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsQwen catalog
Review all tracked Qwen models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Qwen modelsDeepSeek catalog
Check other DeepSeek models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open DeepSeek modelsThe Qwen3.5 27B native vision-language Dense model incorporates a linear attention mechanism, delivering fast response times while balancing inference speed and performance. Its overall capabilities are comparable to those of...
DeepSeek-V3.2 is a large language model designed to harmonize high computational efficiency with strong reasoning and agentic tool-use performance. It introduces DeepSeek Sparse Attention (DSA), a fine-grained sparse attention mechanism...