Ternary Bonsai 2 9B is $0.02 cheaper per 1M input tokens (20% lower; 1.25x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewTernary Bonsai 2 9B vs Claude Haiku 5.5
Pick Ternary Bonsai 2 9B for lower cost; pick Claude Haiku 5.5 only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Ternary Bonsai 2 9B for lower cost; pick Claude Haiku 5.5 only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Ternary Bonsai 2 9B is estimated at $0.15 vs $0.35 for Claude Haiku 5.5, saving $0.2 (58.6% lower).
Cost-first pickTernary Bonsai 2 9B
Context-first pickClaude Haiku 5.5
Sample savings$0.258.6%
10x traffic gap$2.05
Claude Haiku 5.5 has more context, but Ternary Bonsai 2 9B saves $0.2 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $2.05. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Ternary Bonsai 2 9B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Ternary Bonsai 2 9B | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Ternary Bonsai 2 9B | $0.47 | $0.75 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Ternary Bonsai 2 9B | $0.21 | $0.6 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Ternary Bonsai 2 9B | $0.73 | $2.6 |
Ternary Bonsai 2 9B is $0.37 cheaper per 1M output tokens (74% lower; 3.85x difference).
Claude Haiku 5.5 has 737.86K more context (3.81x larger).
Ternary Bonsai 2 9B is $0.2 cheaper on the standard workload (58.6% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Ternary Bonsai 2 9B has the lower input price; Ternary Bonsai 2 9B has the lower output price; Claude Haiku 5.5 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Ternary Bonsai 2 9B is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.15 for Ternary Bonsai 2 9B and $0.35 for Claude Haiku 5.5.
Choose Ternary Bonsai 2 9B when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 when you care most about larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Ternary Bonsai 2 9B is estimated at $0.15 vs $0.35 for Claude Haiku 5.5, saving $0.2 (58.6% lower).
- Ternary Bonsai 2 9B is $0.2 cheaper on the standard workload (58.6% lower).
- Ternary Bonsai 2 9B is $0.02 cheaper per 1M input tokens (20% lower; 1.25x difference).
- Ternary Bonsai 2 9B is $0.37 cheaper per 1M output tokens (74% lower; 3.85x difference).
- Claude Haiku 5.5 has 737.86K more context (3.81x larger).
| Feature | NewTernary Bonsai 2 9B (PrismML) | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Anthropic) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.08 | $0.1 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.13 | $0.5 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.15 | $0.35 |
| Context Window | 262.14K | 1M |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Ternary Bonsai 2 9B | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Ternary Bonsai 2 9B is estimated at $0.15 vs $0.35 for Claude Haiku 5.5, saving $0.2 (58.6% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Ternary Bonsai 2 9B | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Ternary Bonsai 2 9B | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Claude Haiku 5.5 | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) can replace Claude Haiku 5.5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.17.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.25 sample workload cost.
- GPT-6 Luna offers 1.05M context with $0.35 sample workload cost.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.28 sample workload cost.
- GPT-6 Luna Pro offers 1.05M context with $0.35 sample workload cost.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro · MoonshotAI · #1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 · DeepSeek · #2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · DeepSeek · #3
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsPrismML catalog
Review all tracked PrismML models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open PrismML modelsAnthropic catalog
Check other Anthropic models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Anthropic modelsTernary Bonsai 2 9B is PrismML’s compact, open-weight language model for conversational AI, reasoning, and tool use. Built on Qwen3.5, it uses ternary weights packed into 2 bits for efficient...
Claude Haiku 5.5 is Anthropic's small, fast model for high-volume, cost-sensitive work such as summarization, subagents, and browser use. It succeeds Claude Haiku 4.5 with stronger coding, computer use, and...