Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is $2.92 cheaper per 1M input tokens (97.5% lower; 40x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewTernary Bonsai 2 27B vs Kimi K3 (batch)
Pick Ternary Bonsai 2 27B for lower cost; pick Kimi K3 (batch) only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Ternary Bonsai 2 27B for lower cost; pick Kimi K3 (batch) only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is estimated at $0.33 vs $10.5 for Kimi K3 (batch), saving $10.18 (96.9% lower).
Cost-first pickTernary Bonsai 2 27B
Context-first pickKimi K3 (batch)
Sample savings$10.1896.9%
10x traffic gap$101.75
Kimi K3 (batch) has more context, but Ternary Bonsai 2 27B saves $10.18 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $101.75. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Ternary Bonsai 2 27B | Kimi K3 (batch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Ternary Bonsai 2 27B | $0.62 | $22.5 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Ternary Bonsai 2 27B | $0.57 | $18 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Ternary Bonsai 2 27B | $2.58 | $78 |
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is $14.5 cheaper per 1M output tokens (96.7% lower; 30x difference).
Kimi K3 (batch) has 786.43K more context (4x larger).
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is $10.18 cheaper on the standard workload (96.9% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B has the lower input price; Ternary Bonsai 2 27B has the lower output price; Kimi K3 (batch) offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.33 for Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and $10.5 for Kimi K3 (batch).
Choose Ternary Bonsai 2 27B when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
Choose Kimi K3 (batch) when you care most about larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is estimated at $0.33 vs $10.5 for Kimi K3 (batch), saving $10.18 (96.9% lower).
- Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is $10.18 cheaper on the standard workload (96.9% lower).
- Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is $2.92 cheaper per 1M input tokens (97.5% lower; 40x difference).
- Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is $14.5 cheaper per 1M output tokens (96.7% lower; 30x difference).
- Kimi K3 (batch) has 786.43K more context (4x larger).
| Feature | NewTernary Bonsai 2 27B (PrismML) | Kimi K3 (batch) (MoonshotAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.075 | $3 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.5 | $15 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.33 | $10.5 |
| Context Window | 262.14K | 1.05M |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Ternary Bonsai 2 27B | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is estimated at $0.33 vs $10.5 for Kimi K3 (batch), saving $10.18 (96.9% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Ternary Bonsai 2 27B | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Ternary Bonsai 2 27B | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Kimi K3 (batch) | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Kimi K2.7 Code (free) can replace Kimi K3 (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Kimi K2.6 (free) can replace Kimi K3 (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Kimi K2.5 can replace Kimi K3 (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.57.
- Kimi K2 0711 can replace Kimi K3 (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.72.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- GLM 5.3 Flash offers 1.31M context with $0.24 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.08 sample workload cost.
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) · Qwen · #1
- GPT-5.6 Luna · OpenAI · #2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · DeepSeek · #3
- Hy4 preview · Tencent · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsPrismML catalog
Review all tracked PrismML models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open PrismML modelsMoonshotAI catalog
Check other MoonshotAI models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open MoonshotAI modelsBonsai 2 27B is a 27B-parameter reasoning model from PrismML derived from Qwen3.8-27B. It supports coding, mathematics, tool calling, and image understanding with a 262K-token context window. Ternary compression shrinks...
Kimi K3 is a 2.8T parameter open-weight multimodal reasoning model from Moonshot AI. It is suited for complex coding, knowledge work, and long-horizon agentic workflows, and is particularly strong at...