Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is $0.42 cheaper per 1M input tokens (85% lower; 6.67x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewTernary Bonsai 2 27B vs Seed-2.0-Code
Pick Ternary Bonsai 2 27B when budget is the priority.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Ternary Bonsai 2 27B when budget is the priority.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is estimated at $0.33 vs $2 for Seed-2.0-Code, saving $1.68 (83.8% lower).
Cost-first pickTernary Bonsai 2 27B
Context-first pickBoth models
Sample savings$1.6883.8%
10x traffic gap$16.75
The reported context window is tied, so cost and provider fit carry more weight. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $16.75. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Ternary Bonsai 2 27B | Seed-2.0-Code |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Ternary Bonsai 2 27B | $0.62 | $4 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Ternary Bonsai 2 27B | $0.57 | $3.5 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Ternary Bonsai 2 27B | $2.58 | $15.5 |
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is $2.5 cheaper per 1M output tokens (83.3% lower; 6x difference).
Both models report the same context window at 262.14K tokens.
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is $1.68 cheaper on the standard workload (83.8% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B has the lower input price; Ternary Bonsai 2 27B has the lower output price; both models report the same context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.33 for Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and $2 for Seed-2.0-Code.
Choose Ternary Bonsai 2 27B when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
Choose Seed-2.0-Code when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is estimated at $0.33 vs $2 for Seed-2.0-Code, saving $1.68 (83.8% lower).
- Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is $1.68 cheaper on the standard workload (83.8% lower).
- Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is $0.42 cheaper per 1M input tokens (85% lower; 6.67x difference).
- Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is $2.5 cheaper per 1M output tokens (83.3% lower; 6x difference).
- Both models report the same context window at 262.14K tokens.
| Feature | NewTernary Bonsai 2 27B (PrismML) | Seed-2.0-Code (ByteDance Seed) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.075 | $0.5 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.5 | $3 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.33 | $2 |
| Context Window | 262.14K | 262.14K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Ternary Bonsai 2 27B | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is estimated at $0.33 vs $2 for Seed-2.0-Code, saving $1.68 (83.8% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Ternary Bonsai 2 27B | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Ternary Bonsai 2 27B | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Tie | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Seed 1.6 Flash can replace Seed-2.0-Code when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.22.
- Seed-2.0-Mini can replace Seed-2.0-Code when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.3.
- Seed-2.0-Lite can replace Seed-2.0-Code when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.25.
- Seed 1.6 can replace Seed-2.0-Code when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.25.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- GLM 5.3 Flash offers 1.31M context with $0.24 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.08 sample workload cost.
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) · Qwen · #1
- GPT-5.6 Luna · OpenAI · #2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · DeepSeek · #3
- Hy4 preview · Tencent · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsPrismML catalog
Review all tracked PrismML models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open PrismML modelsByteDance Seed catalog
Check other ByteDance Seed models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open ByteDance Seed modelsBonsai 2 27B is a 27B-parameter reasoning model from PrismML derived from Qwen3.8-27B. It supports coding, mathematics, tool calling, and image understanding with a 262K-token context window. Ternary compression shrinks...
Seed 2.0 Code is a model from ByteDance Seed optimized for agentic coding. It is suited for frontend development, multilingual programming tasks, and coding-agent workflows in tools such as Claude...