API cost decision in 10 seconds

NewLaguna M.1 (free) vs GPT-4.1 Nano

Pick Laguna M.1 (free) for lower cost; pick GPT-4.1 Nano only if the larger context window matters more.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Laguna M.1 (free) for lower cost; pick GPT-4.1 Nano only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Laguna M.1 (free) is estimated at $0 vs $0.3 for GPT-4.1 Nano, saving $0.3 (100% lower).

Cost-first pickLaguna M.1 (free)
Context-first pickGPT-4.1 Nano
Sample savings$0.3100%
10x traffic gap$3

GPT-4.1 Nano has more context, but Laguna M.1 (free) saves $0.3 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $3. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Laguna M.1 (free) stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickLaguna M.1 (free)GPT-4.1 Nano
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputLaguna M.1 (free)$0$0.7
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputLaguna M.1 (free)$0$0.5
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputLaguna M.1 (free)$0$2.1
Cheaper input Laguna M.1 (free) $0 vs $0.1 / 1M

Laguna M.1 (free) is free for input tokens while GPT-4.1 Nano costs $0.1 per 1M tokens.

Cheaper output Laguna M.1 (free) $0 vs $0.4 / 1M

Laguna M.1 (free) is free for output tokens while GPT-4.1 Nano costs $0.4 per 1M tokens.

Larger context GPT-4.1 Nano 262.14K vs 1.05M

GPT-4.1 Nano has 785.43K more context (4x larger).

Sample workload Laguna M.1 (free) $0 vs $0.3

Laguna M.1 (free) is free for the standard workload while the other model is estimated at $0.3.

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
Laguna M.1 (free) Calculating… Estimated API cost
GPT-4.1 Nano Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Laguna M.1 (free) has the lower input price; Laguna M.1 (free) has the lower output price; GPT-4.1 Nano offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Laguna M.1 (free) is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0 for Laguna M.1 (free) and $0.3 for GPT-4.1 Nano.

Best Fit

Choose Laguna M.1 (free) when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Choose GPT-4.1 Nano when you care most about larger context window.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Laguna M.1 (free) is estimated at $0 vs $0.3 for GPT-4.1 Nano, saving $0.3 (100% lower).
  • Laguna M.1 (free) is free for the standard workload while the other model is estimated at $0.3.
  • Laguna M.1 (free) is free for input tokens while GPT-4.1 Nano costs $0.1 per 1M tokens.
  • Laguna M.1 (free) is free for output tokens while GPT-4.1 Nano costs $0.4 per 1M tokens.
  • GPT-4.1 Nano has 785.43K more context (4x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureNewLaguna M.1 (free)
(Poolside)
GPT-4.1 Nano
(OpenAI)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$0$0.1
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$0$0.4
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$0$0.3
Context Window262.14K1.05M
Release Date
Popularity#21#73

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionLaguna M.1 (free)On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Laguna M.1 (free) is estimated at $0 vs $0.3 for GPT-4.1 Nano, saving $0.3 (100% lower).
High-volume input processingLaguna M.1 (free)Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsLaguna M.1 (free)Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workGPT-4.1 NanoA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace GPT-4.1 Nano when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace GPT-4.1 Nano when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • gpt-oss-20b can replace GPT-4.1 Nano when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
  • gpt-oss-120b can replace GPT-4.1 Nano when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.13.
Larger context near this budget

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Poolside catalog

Review all tracked Poolside models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Poolside models

OpenAI catalog

Check other OpenAI models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open OpenAI models
Laguna M.1 (free)

Laguna M.1 is the flagship coding agent model from [Poolside](https://poolside.ai), optimized for complex software engineering tasks. Designed for agentic coding workflows, it supports tool calling and reasoning, with a 128K...

GPT-4.1 Nano

For tasks that demand low latency, GPT‑4.1 nano is the fastest and cheapest model in the GPT-4.1 series. It delivers exceptional performance at a small size with its 1 million...