Perceptron Mk1.5 is $0.15 cheaper per 1M input tokens (50% lower; 2x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewPerceptron Mk1.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
The standard workload cost is tied; choose by context window, provider fit, latency, or model quality.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
The standard workload cost is tied; choose by context window, provider fit, latency, or model quality.
Both models are estimated at $0.9 for the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Cost-first pickTie
Context-first pickMuse Glimmer 30B
Sample savings$00%
10x traffic gap$0
Context-window winner: Muse Glimmer 30B. Cost does not separate this pair on the standard workload, so the next decision point is context window and model behavior.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors Perceptron Mk1.5, balanced workload favors Muse Glimmer 30B, and output-heavy chatbot favors Muse Glimmer 30B.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Perceptron Mk1.5 | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Perceptron Mk1.5 | $1.5 | $2.1 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Muse Glimmer 30B | $1.65 | $1.5 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Muse Glimmer 30B | $7.65 | $6.3 |
Muse Glimmer 30B is $0.3 cheaper per 1M output tokens (20% lower; 1.25x difference).
Muse Glimmer 30B has 94.21K more context (3.56x larger).
Muse Glimmer 30B is $0 cheaper on the standard workload (0% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Perceptron Mk1.5 has the lower input price; Muse Glimmer 30B has the lower output price; Muse Glimmer 30B offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.9 for Perceptron Mk1.5 and $0.9 for Muse Glimmer 30B.
Choose Perceptron Mk1.5 when you care most about lower input-token price.
Choose Muse Glimmer 30B when you care most about lower output-token price, and larger context window.
- Both models are estimated at $0.9 for the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
- Muse Glimmer 30B is $0 cheaper on the standard workload (0% lower).
- Perceptron Mk1.5 is $0.15 cheaper per 1M input tokens (50% lower; 2x difference).
- Muse Glimmer 30B is $0.3 cheaper per 1M output tokens (20% lower; 1.25x difference).
- Muse Glimmer 30B has 94.21K more context (3.56x larger).
| Feature | NewPerceptron Mk1.5 (Perceptron) | Muse Glimmer 30B (Meta) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.15 | $0.3 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $1.5 | $1.2 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.9 | $0.9 |
| Context Window | 36.86K | 131.07K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Tie | Both models are estimated at $0.9 for the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload. |
| High-volume input processing | Perceptron Mk1.5 | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Muse Glimmer 30B | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Muse Glimmer 30B | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free) can replace Muse Glimmer 30B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Llama 3.2 3B Instruct (free) can replace Muse Glimmer 30B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Llama 3.1 8B Instruct can replace Muse Glimmer 30B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.09.
- Llama 3.2 1B Instruct can replace Muse Glimmer 30B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.13.
- GLM 5.3 Flash offers 1.31M context with $0.12 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.19 sample workload cost.
- GLM Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.12 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.19 sample workload cost.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro · Xiaomi · #1
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · DeepSeek · #3
- Hy4 preview · Tencent · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsPerceptron catalog
Review all tracked Perceptron models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Perceptron modelsMeta catalog
Check other Meta models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Meta modelsPerceptron Mk1.5 is Perceptron's embodied reasoning model for physical agents. It accepts text, image, video, and audio input, and answers with text plus optional structured annotations: points, boxes, polygons, tracks,...
Muse Glimmer 30B is a dense, open-weight multimodal model from Meta Superintelligence Labs, distilled from Muse Spark and optimized for autonomous agents on consumer hardware. It is suited for long-horizon...