Particle-1 is $1.75 cheaper per 1M input tokens (87.5% lower; 8x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewParticle-1 vs Claude Opus 5.5 (batch)
Pick Particle-1 when budget and context both matter.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Particle-1 when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Particle-1 is estimated at $0.75 vs $7 for Claude Opus 5.5 (batch), saving $6.25 (89.3% lower).
Cost-first pickParticle-1
Context-first pickParticle-1
Sample savings$6.2589.3%
10x traffic gap$62.5
Particle-1 is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $62.5. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Particle-1 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Particle-1 | Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Particle-1 | $1.75 | $15 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Particle-1 | $1.25 | $12 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Particle-1 | $5.25 | $52 |
Particle-1 is $9 cheaper per 1M output tokens (90% lower; 10x difference).
Particle-1 has 48.58K more context (1.05x larger).
Particle-1 is $6.25 cheaper on the standard workload (89.3% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Particle-1 has the lower input price; Particle-1 has the lower output price; Particle-1 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Particle-1 is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.75 for Particle-1 and $7 for Claude Opus 5.5 (batch).
Choose Particle-1 when you care most about lower input-token price, lower output-token price, and larger context window.
Choose Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Particle-1 is estimated at $0.75 vs $7 for Claude Opus 5.5 (batch), saving $6.25 (89.3% lower).
- Particle-1 is $6.25 cheaper on the standard workload (89.3% lower).
- Particle-1 is $1.75 cheaper per 1M input tokens (87.5% lower; 8x difference).
- Particle-1 is $9 cheaper per 1M output tokens (90% lower; 10x difference).
- Particle-1 has 48.58K more context (1.05x larger).
| Feature | NewParticle-1 (Particle AI) | Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) (Anthropic) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.25 | $2 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $1 | $10 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.75 | $7 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Particle-1 | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Particle-1 is estimated at $0.75 vs $7 for Claude Opus 5.5 (batch), saving $6.25 (89.3% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Particle-1 | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Particle-1 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Particle-1 | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) can replace Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.17.
- Claude Haiku 5.5 can replace Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.35.
- Claude Haiku Latest can replace Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.35.
- Claude 3 Haiku can replace Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.88.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.25 sample workload cost.
- GPT-6 Luna offers 1.05M context with $0.35 sample workload cost.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro · MoonshotAI · #1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 · DeepSeek · #2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · DeepSeek · #3
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsParticle AI catalog
Review all tracked Particle AI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Particle AI modelsAnthropic catalog
Check other Anthropic models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Anthropic modelsParticle-1 is a token-efficient agentic coding model from Particle AI, post-trained on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash. It is suited for software engineering work such as terminal workflows, codebase changes, and data...
Claude Opus 5.5 is Anthropic's flagship model for demanding reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic work, succeeding Claude Opus 5. It is particularly strong at multi-step changes in large codebases, code...