API cost decision in 10 seconds

GPT Terra Latest vs Muse Spark 1.2

Pick Muse Spark 1.2 for lower cost; pick GPT Terra Latest only if the larger context window matters more.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Muse Spark 1.2 for lower cost; pick GPT Terra Latest only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Muse Spark 1.2 is estimated at $3.38 vs $3.5 for GPT Terra Latest, saving $0.12 (3.6% lower).

Cost-first pickMuse Spark 1.2
Context-first pickGPT Terra Latest
Sample savings$0.123.6%
10x traffic gap$1.25

GPT Terra Latest has more context, but Muse Spark 1.2 saves $0.12 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $1.25. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors GPT Terra Latest, balanced workload favors Muse Spark 1.2, and output-heavy chatbot favors Muse Spark 1.2.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickGPT Terra LatestMuse Spark 1.2
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputGPT Terra Latest$7.5$8.38
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputMuse Spark 1.2$6$5.5
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputMuse Spark 1.2$26$22.5
Cheaper input GPT Terra Latest $1 vs $1.25 / 1M

GPT Terra Latest is $0.25 cheaper per 1M input tokens (20% lower; 1.25x difference).

Cheaper output Muse Spark 1.2 $5 vs $4.25 / 1M

Muse Spark 1.2 is $0.75 cheaper per 1M output tokens (15% lower; 1.18x difference).

Larger context GPT Terra Latest 1.05M vs 1.05M

GPT Terra Latest has 1.42K more context (1x larger).

Sample workload Muse Spark 1.2 $3.5 vs $3.38

Muse Spark 1.2 is $0.12 cheaper on the standard workload (3.6% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
GPT Terra Latest Calculating… Estimated API cost
Muse Spark 1.2 Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

GPT Terra Latest has the lower input price; Muse Spark 1.2 has the lower output price; GPT Terra Latest offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $3.5 for GPT Terra Latest and $3.38 for Muse Spark 1.2.

Best Fit

Choose GPT Terra Latest when you care most about lower input-token price, and larger context window.

Choose Muse Spark 1.2 when you care most about lower output-token price.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Muse Spark 1.2 is estimated at $3.38 vs $3.5 for GPT Terra Latest, saving $0.12 (3.6% lower).
  • Muse Spark 1.2 is $0.12 cheaper on the standard workload (3.6% lower).
  • GPT Terra Latest is $0.25 cheaper per 1M input tokens (20% lower; 1.25x difference).
  • Muse Spark 1.2 is $0.75 cheaper per 1M output tokens (15% lower; 1.18x difference).
  • GPT Terra Latest has 1.42K more context (1x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureGPT Terra Latest
(OpenAI)
Muse Spark 1.2
(Meta)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$1$1.25
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$5$4.25
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$3.5$3.38
Context Window1.05M1.05M
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionMuse Spark 1.2On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Muse Spark 1.2 is estimated at $3.38 vs $3.5 for GPT Terra Latest, saving $0.12 (3.6% lower).
High-volume input processingGPT Terra LatestLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsMuse Spark 1.2Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workGPT Terra LatestA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace GPT Terra Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace GPT Terra Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • gpt-oss-20b can replace GPT Terra Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.06.
  • gpt-oss-20b (batch) can replace GPT Terra Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.08.
Larger context near this budget

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

OpenAI catalog

Review all tracked OpenAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open OpenAI models

Meta catalog

Check other Meta models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Meta models
GPT Terra Latest

This model always redirects to the latest model in the GPT Terra family.

Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 is a reasoning model from Meta, designed for complex agentic tasks. It accepts text, images, video, and PDF documents, returns text, and offers a 1M-token context window....