Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is $1.7 cheaper per 1M input tokens (85% lower; 6.67x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewOpenAI GPT Terra Latest vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite for lower cost; pick OpenAI GPT Terra Latest only if the larger context window matters more.
Budget verdict
Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite for lower cost; pick OpenAI GPT Terra Latest only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is estimated at $1.55 vs $8 for OpenAI GPT Terra Latest, saving $6.45 (80.6% lower).
OpenAI GPT Terra Latest has more context, but Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite saves $6.45 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $64.5. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | OpenAI GPT Terra Latest | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | $16 | $2.75 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | $14 | $2.8 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | $62 | $12.8 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is $9.5 cheaper per 1M output tokens (79.2% lower; 4.8x difference).
OpenAI GPT Terra Latest has 1.42K more context (1x larger).
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is $6.45 cheaper on the standard workload (80.6% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has the lower input price; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has the lower output price; OpenAI GPT Terra Latest offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $8 for OpenAI GPT Terra Latest and $1.55 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
Choose OpenAI GPT Terra Latest when you care most about larger context window.
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is estimated at $1.55 vs $8 for OpenAI GPT Terra Latest, saving $6.45 (80.6% lower).
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is $6.45 cheaper on the standard workload (80.6% lower).
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is $1.7 cheaper per 1M input tokens (85% lower; 6.67x difference).
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is $9.5 cheaper per 1M output tokens (79.2% lower; 4.8x difference).
- OpenAI GPT Terra Latest has 1.42K more context (1x larger).
| Feature | NewOpenAI GPT Terra Latest (OpenAI) | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (Google) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $2 | $0.3 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $12 | $2.5 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $8 | $1.55 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is estimated at $1.55 vs $8 for OpenAI GPT Terra Latest, saving $6.45 (80.6% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | OpenAI GPT Terra Latest | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace OpenAI GPT Terra Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace OpenAI GPT Terra Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b can replace OpenAI GPT Terra Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
- gpt-oss-120b can replace OpenAI GPT Terra Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.12.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- GLM 5.3 Flash offers 1.31M context with $0.4 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.08 sample workload cost.
- Hy4 preview · Tencent · #1
- GPT-5.6 Luna · OpenAI · #2
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #3
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · DeepSeek · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsOpenAI catalog
Review all tracked OpenAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open OpenAI modelsGoogle catalog
Check other Google models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Google modelsThis model always redirects to the latest model in the OpenAI GPT Terra family.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is a high-efficiency model from Google with upgraded agentic capabilities. It is suited for subagents that execute focused tasks within complex, multi-agent workflows.