DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) is $1.89 cheaper per 1M input tokens (94.4% lower; 17.9x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewGPT Terra Latest vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch)
Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) for lower cost; pick GPT Terra Latest only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) for lower cost; pick GPT Terra Latest only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) is estimated at $0.28 vs $8 for GPT Terra Latest, saving $7.72 (96.5% lower).
Cost-first pickDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch)
Context-first pickGPT Terra Latest
Sample savings$7.7296.5%
10x traffic gap$77.2
GPT Terra Latest has more context, but DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) saves $7.72 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $77.2. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | GPT Terra Latest | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) | $16 | $0.73 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) | $14 | $0.45 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) | $62 | $1.79 |
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) is $11.66 cheaper per 1M output tokens (97.2% lower; 35.7x difference).
GPT Terra Latest has 1.42K more context (1x larger).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) is $7.72 cheaper on the standard workload (96.5% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) has the lower input price; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) has the lower output price; GPT Terra Latest offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $8 for GPT Terra Latest and $0.28 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch).
Choose GPT Terra Latest when you care most about larger context window.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) is estimated at $0.28 vs $8 for GPT Terra Latest, saving $7.72 (96.5% lower).
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) is $7.72 cheaper on the standard workload (96.5% lower).
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) is $1.89 cheaper per 1M input tokens (94.4% lower; 17.9x difference).
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) is $11.66 cheaper per 1M output tokens (97.2% lower; 35.7x difference).
- GPT Terra Latest has 1.42K more context (1x larger).
| Feature | NewGPT Terra Latest (OpenAI) | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) (DeepSeek) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $2 | $0.112 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $12 | $0.336 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $8 | $0.28 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) is estimated at $0.28 vs $8 for GPT Terra Latest, saving $7.72 (96.5% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | GPT Terra Latest | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace GPT Terra Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace GPT Terra Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b can replace GPT Terra Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.06.
- gpt-oss-20b (batch) can replace GPT Terra Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.08.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- GLM 5.3 Flash offers 1.31M context with $0.4 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.36 sample workload cost.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro · Xiaomi · #1
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) · Qwen · #2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · DeepSeek · #3
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsOpenAI catalog
Review all tracked OpenAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open OpenAI modelsDeepSeek catalog
Check other DeepSeek models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open DeepSeek modelsThis model always redirects to the latest model in the GPT Terra family.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is a sparse mixture-of-experts model from DeepSeek, and the first built on the company's Causal Encoder-Decoder (CED) architecture. It activates 8B parameters on input and 16B on...