gpt-oss-120b is $0.06 cheaper per 1M input tokens (61% lower; 2.56x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥gpt-oss-120b vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507
Pick gpt-oss-120b when budget and context both matter.
Budget verdict
Pick gpt-oss-120b when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, gpt-oss-120b is estimated at $0.13 vs $0.25 for Voxtral Small 24B 2507, saving $0.12 (48.4% lower).
gpt-oss-120b is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $1.21. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
gpt-oss-120b stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | gpt-oss-120b | Voxtral Small 24B 2507 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | gpt-oss-120b | $0.29 | $0.65 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | gpt-oss-120b | $0.22 | $0.4 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | gpt-oss-120b | $0.94 | $1.6 |
gpt-oss-120b is $0.12 cheaper per 1M output tokens (40% lower; 1.67x difference).
gpt-oss-120b has 99.07K more context (4.1x larger).
gpt-oss-120b is $0.12 cheaper on the standard workload (48.4% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
gpt-oss-120b has the lower input price; gpt-oss-120b has the lower output price; gpt-oss-120b offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, gpt-oss-120b is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.13 for gpt-oss-120b and $0.25 for Voxtral Small 24B 2507.
Choose gpt-oss-120b when you care most about lower input-token price, lower output-token price, and larger context window.
Choose Voxtral Small 24B 2507 when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, gpt-oss-120b is estimated at $0.13 vs $0.25 for Voxtral Small 24B 2507, saving $0.12 (48.4% lower).
- gpt-oss-120b is $0.12 cheaper on the standard workload (48.4% lower).
- gpt-oss-120b is $0.06 cheaper per 1M input tokens (61% lower; 2.56x difference).
- gpt-oss-120b is $0.12 cheaper per 1M output tokens (40% lower; 1.67x difference).
- gpt-oss-120b has 99.07K more context (4.1x larger).
| Feature | 🔥gpt-oss-120b (OpenAI) | Voxtral Small 24B 2507 (Mistral) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.039 | $0.1 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.18 | $0.3 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.13 | $0.25 |
| Context Window | 131.07K | 32K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #20 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | gpt-oss-120b | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, gpt-oss-120b is estimated at $0.13 vs $0.25 for Voxtral Small 24B 2507, saving $0.12 (48.4% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | gpt-oss-120b | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | gpt-oss-120b | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | gpt-oss-120b | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace gpt-oss-120b when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace gpt-oss-120b when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b can replace gpt-oss-120b when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
- Mistral Nemo can replace Voxtral Small 24B 2507 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.04.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite offers 1.05M context with $0.3 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsOpenAI catalog
Review all tracked OpenAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open OpenAI modelsMistral catalog
Check other Mistral models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Mistral modelsgpt-oss-120b is an open-weight, 117B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language model from OpenAI designed for high-reasoning, agentic, and general-purpose production use cases. It activates 5.1B parameters per forward pass and is optimized...
Voxtral Small is an enhancement of Mistral Small 3, incorporating state-of-the-art audio input capabilities while retaining best-in-class text performance. It excels at speech transcription, translation and audio understanding. Input audio...