LFM2-24B-A2B is $0.009 cheaper per 1M input tokens (23.1% lower; 1.3x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥gpt-oss-120b vs LFM2-24B-A2B
Pick LFM2-24B-A2B for lower cost; pick gpt-oss-120b only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick LFM2-24B-A2B for lower cost; pick gpt-oss-120b only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, LFM2-24B-A2B is estimated at $0.09 vs $0.13 for gpt-oss-120b, saving $0.04 (30.2% lower).
Cost-first pickLFM2-24B-A2B
Context-first pickgpt-oss-120b
Sample savings$0.0430.2%
10x traffic gap$0.39
gpt-oss-120b has more context, but LFM2-24B-A2B saves $0.04 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.39. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
LFM2-24B-A2B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | gpt-oss-120b | LFM2-24B-A2B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | LFM2-24B-A2B | $0.29 | $0.21 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | LFM2-24B-A2B | $0.22 | $0.15 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | LFM2-24B-A2B | $0.94 | $0.63 |
LFM2-24B-A2B is $0.06 cheaper per 1M output tokens (33.3% lower; 1.5x difference).
gpt-oss-120b has 3.07K more context (1.02x larger).
LFM2-24B-A2B is $0.04 cheaper on the standard workload (30.2% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
LFM2-24B-A2B has the lower input price; LFM2-24B-A2B has the lower output price; gpt-oss-120b offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, LFM2-24B-A2B is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.13 for gpt-oss-120b and $0.09 for LFM2-24B-A2B.
Choose gpt-oss-120b when you care most about larger context window.
Choose LFM2-24B-A2B when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, LFM2-24B-A2B is estimated at $0.09 vs $0.13 for gpt-oss-120b, saving $0.04 (30.2% lower).
- LFM2-24B-A2B is $0.04 cheaper on the standard workload (30.2% lower).
- LFM2-24B-A2B is $0.009 cheaper per 1M input tokens (23.1% lower; 1.3x difference).
- LFM2-24B-A2B is $0.06 cheaper per 1M output tokens (33.3% lower; 1.5x difference).
- gpt-oss-120b has 3.07K more context (1.02x larger).
| Feature | 🔥gpt-oss-120b (OpenAI) | LFM2-24B-A2B (LiquidAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.039 | $0.03 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.18 | $0.12 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.13 | $0.09 |
| Context Window | 131.07K | 128K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #20 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | LFM2-24B-A2B | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, LFM2-24B-A2B is estimated at $0.09 vs $0.13 for gpt-oss-120b, saving $0.04 (30.2% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | LFM2-24B-A2B | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | LFM2-24B-A2B | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | gpt-oss-120b | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace gpt-oss-120b when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace gpt-oss-120b when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b can replace gpt-oss-120b when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
- LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free) can replace LFM2-24B-A2B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- Lyria 3 Pro Preview offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- Lyria 3 Clip Preview offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsOpenAI catalog
Review all tracked OpenAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open OpenAI modelsLiquidAI catalog
Check other LiquidAI models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open LiquidAI modelsgpt-oss-120b is an open-weight, 117B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language model from OpenAI designed for high-reasoning, agentic, and general-purpose production use cases. It activates 5.1B parameters per forward pass and is optimized...
LFM2-24B-A2B is the largest model in the LFM2 family of hybrid architectures designed for efficient on-device deployment. Built as a 24B parameter Mixture-of-Experts model with only 2B active parameters per...