GPT Audio Mini is $0.4 cheaper per 1M input tokens (40% lower; 1.67x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
GPT Audio Mini vs Relace Search
Pick GPT Audio Mini for lower cost; pick Relace Search only if the larger context window matters more.
Pricing data updated:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick GPT Audio Mini for lower cost; pick Relace Search only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT Audio Mini is estimated at $1.8 vs $2.5 for Relace Search, saving $0.7 (28% lower).
Cost-first pickGPT Audio Mini
Context-first pickRelace Search
Sample savings$0.728%
10x traffic gap$7
Relace Search has more context, but GPT Audio Mini saves $0.7 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $7. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
GPT Audio Mini stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | GPT Audio Mini | Relace Search |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | GPT Audio Mini | $4.2 | $6.5 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | GPT Audio Mini | $3 | $4 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | GPT Audio Mini | $12.6 | $16 |
GPT Audio Mini is $0.6 cheaper per 1M output tokens (20% lower; 1.25x difference).
Relace Search has 128K more context (2x larger).
GPT Audio Mini is $0.7 cheaper on the standard workload (28% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
GPT Audio Mini has the lower input price; GPT Audio Mini has the lower output price; Relace Search offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, GPT Audio Mini is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $1.8 for GPT Audio Mini and $2.5 for Relace Search.
Choose GPT Audio Mini when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
Choose Relace Search when you care most about larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT Audio Mini is estimated at $1.8 vs $2.5 for Relace Search, saving $0.7 (28% lower).
- GPT Audio Mini is $0.7 cheaper on the standard workload (28% lower).
- GPT Audio Mini is $0.4 cheaper per 1M input tokens (40% lower; 1.67x difference).
- GPT Audio Mini is $0.6 cheaper per 1M output tokens (20% lower; 1.25x difference).
- Relace Search has 128K more context (2x larger).
| Feature | GPT Audio Mini (OpenAI) | Relace Search (Relace) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.6 | $1 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $2.4 | $3 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $1.8 | $2.5 |
| Context Window | 128K | 256K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | GPT Audio Mini | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT Audio Mini is estimated at $1.8 vs $2.5 for Relace Search, saving $0.7 (28% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | GPT Audio Mini | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | GPT Audio Mini | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Relace Search | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace GPT Audio Mini when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace GPT Audio Mini when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b can replace GPT Audio Mini when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
- gpt-oss-120b can replace GPT Audio Mini when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.13.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite offers 1.05M context with $1 sample workload cost.
- No popular competitor is currently available.
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsOpenAI catalog
Review all tracked OpenAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open OpenAI modelsRelace catalog
Check other Relace models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Relace modelsA cost-efficient version of GPT Audio. The new snapshot features an upgraded decoder for more natural sounding voices and maintains better voice consistency. Input is priced at $0.60 per million...
The relace-search model uses 4-12 `view_file` and `grep` tools in parallel to explore a codebase and return relevant files to the user request. In contrast to RAG, relace-search performs agentic...