API cost decision in 10 seconds

NewGPT-6.1 Terra vs Mistral Large 4

Pick Mistral Large 4 for lower cost; pick GPT-6.1 Terra only if the larger context window matters more.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Mistral Large 4 for lower cost; pick GPT-6.1 Terra only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Mistral Large 4 is estimated at $3.45 vs $3.5 for GPT-6.1 Terra, saving $0.05 (1.4% lower).

Cost-first pickMistral Large 4
Context-first pickGPT-6.1 Terra
Sample savings$0.051.4%
10x traffic gap$0.5

GPT-6.1 Terra has more context, but Mistral Large 4 saves $0.05 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.5. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors GPT-6.1 Terra, balanced workload favors Mistral Large 4, and output-heavy chatbot favors Mistral Large 4.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickGPT-6.1 TerraMistral Large 4
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputGPT-6.1 Terra$7.5$8.89
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputMistral Large 4$6$5.54
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputMistral Large 4$26$22.26
Cheaper input GPT-6.1 Terra $1 vs $1.36 / 1M

GPT-6.1 Terra is $0.36 cheaper per 1M input tokens (26.5% lower; 1.36x difference).

Cheaper output Mistral Large 4 $5 vs $4.18 / 1M

Mistral Large 4 is $0.82 cheaper per 1M output tokens (16.4% lower; 1.2x difference).

Larger context GPT-6.1 Terra 1.05M vs 1.05M

GPT-6.1 Terra has 1.42K more context (1x larger).

Sample workload Mistral Large 4 $3.5 vs $3.45

Mistral Large 4 is $0.05 cheaper on the standard workload (1.4% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
GPT-6.1 Terra Calculating… Estimated API cost
Mistral Large 4 Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

GPT-6.1 Terra has the lower input price; Mistral Large 4 has the lower output price; GPT-6.1 Terra offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Mistral Large 4 is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $3.5 for GPT-6.1 Terra and $3.45 for Mistral Large 4.

Best Fit

Choose GPT-6.1 Terra when you care most about lower input-token price, and larger context window.

Choose Mistral Large 4 when you care most about lower output-token price.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Mistral Large 4 is estimated at $3.45 vs $3.5 for GPT-6.1 Terra, saving $0.05 (1.4% lower).
  • Mistral Large 4 is $0.05 cheaper on the standard workload (1.4% lower).
  • GPT-6.1 Terra is $0.36 cheaper per 1M input tokens (26.5% lower; 1.36x difference).
  • Mistral Large 4 is $0.82 cheaper per 1M output tokens (16.4% lower; 1.2x difference).
  • GPT-6.1 Terra has 1.42K more context (1x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureNewGPT-6.1 Terra
(OpenAI)
Mistral Large 4
(Mistral)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$1$1.36
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$5$4.18
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$3.5$3.45
Context Window1.05M1.05M
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionMistral Large 4On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Mistral Large 4 is estimated at $3.45 vs $3.5 for GPT-6.1 Terra, saving $0.05 (1.4% lower).
High-volume input processingGPT-6.1 TerraLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsMistral Large 4Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workGPT-6.1 TerraA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace GPT-6.1 Terra when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace GPT-6.1 Terra when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • gpt-oss-20b can replace GPT-6.1 Terra when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.06.
  • gpt-oss-20b (batch) can replace GPT-6.1 Terra when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.08.
Larger context near this budget

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

OpenAI catalog

Review all tracked OpenAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open OpenAI models

Mistral catalog

Check other Mistral models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Mistral models
GPT-6.1 Terra

GPT-6.1 Terra is the mid-tier model in OpenAI's GPT-6.1 series, priced below GPT-6.1 Sol. It is suited for everyday agentic, coding, and writing work, is particularly strong at understanding screenshots...

Mistral Large 4

Mistral Large 4 is a frontier multimodal (text and image input) model from Mistral AI built for reasoning, coding, and agentic workloads. It offers a 1M-token context window with up...