Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) is $0.45 cheaper per 1M input tokens (90% lower; 10x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewGPT-6.1 Terra (batch) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch)
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) for lower cost; pick GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) for lower cost; pick GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) is estimated at $0.17 vs $1.75 for GPT-6.1 Terra (batch), saving $1.57 (90% lower).
Cost-first pickClaude Haiku 5.5 (batch)
Context-first pickGPT-6.1 Terra (batch)
Sample savings$1.5790%
10x traffic gap$15.75
GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) has more context, but Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) saves $1.57 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $15.75. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) | Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) | $3.75 | $0.38 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) | $3 | $0.3 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) | $13 | $1.3 |
Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) is $2.25 cheaper per 1M output tokens (90% lower; 10x difference).
GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) has 50K more context (1.05x larger).
Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) is $1.57 cheaper on the standard workload (90% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) has the lower input price; Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) has the lower output price; GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $1.75 for GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) and $0.17 for Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch).
Choose GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) when you care most about larger context window.
Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) is estimated at $0.17 vs $1.75 for GPT-6.1 Terra (batch), saving $1.57 (90% lower).
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) is $1.57 cheaper on the standard workload (90% lower).
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) is $0.45 cheaper per 1M input tokens (90% lower; 10x difference).
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) is $2.25 cheaper per 1M output tokens (90% lower; 10x difference).
- GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) has 50K more context (1.05x larger).
| Feature | NewGPT-6.1 Terra (batch) (OpenAI) | Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) (Anthropic) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.5 | $0.05 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $2.5 | $0.25 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $1.75 | $0.17 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) is estimated at $0.17 vs $1.75 for GPT-6.1 Terra (batch), saving $1.57 (90% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b can replace GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.06.
- gpt-oss-20b (batch) can replace GPT-6.1 Terra (batch) when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.08.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.25 sample workload cost.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro · MoonshotAI · #1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 · DeepSeek · #2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · DeepSeek · #3
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsOpenAI catalog
Review all tracked OpenAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open OpenAI modelsAnthropic catalog
Check other Anthropic models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Anthropic modelsGPT-6.1 Terra is the mid-tier model in OpenAI's GPT-6.1 series, priced below GPT-6.1 Sol. It is suited for everyday agentic, coding, and writing work, is particularly strong at understanding screenshots...
Claude Haiku 5.5 is Anthropic's small, fast model for high-volume, cost-sensitive work such as summarization, subagents, and browser use. It succeeds Claude Haiku 4.5 with stronger coding, computer use, and...