Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is $0.5 cheaper per 1M input tokens (25% lower; 1.33x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥GPT-6.1 Sol vs NewGemini Omni 1.1 Flash
Pick Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash for lower cost; pick GPT-6.1 Sol only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash for lower cost; pick GPT-6.1 Sol only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is estimated at $6 vs $7 for GPT-6.1 Sol, saving $1 (14.3% lower).
Cost-first pickGemini Omni 1.1 Flash
Context-first pickGPT-6.1 Sol
Sample savings$114.3%
10x traffic gap$10
GPT-6.1 Sol has more context, but Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash saves $1 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $10. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | GPT-6.1 Sol | Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash | $15 | $12 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash | $12 | $10.5 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash | $52 | $46.5 |
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is $1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (10% lower; 1.11x difference).
GPT-6.1 Sol has 918.93K more context (8.01x larger).
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is $1 cheaper on the standard workload (14.3% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash has the lower input price; Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash has the lower output price; GPT-6.1 Sol offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $7 for GPT-6.1 Sol and $6 for Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash.
Choose GPT-6.1 Sol when you care most about larger context window.
Choose Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is estimated at $6 vs $7 for GPT-6.1 Sol, saving $1 (14.3% lower).
- Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is $1 cheaper on the standard workload (14.3% lower).
- Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is $0.5 cheaper per 1M input tokens (25% lower; 1.33x difference).
- Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is $1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (10% lower; 1.11x difference).
- GPT-6.1 Sol has 918.93K more context (8.01x larger).
| Feature | 🔥GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI) | NewGemini Omni 1.1 Flash (Google) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $2 | $1.5 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $10 | $9 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $7 | $6 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 131.07K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #11 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is estimated at $6 vs $7 for GPT-6.1 Sol, saving $1 (14.3% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | GPT-6.1 Sol | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace GPT-6.1 Sol when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace GPT-6.1 Sol when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b (batch) can replace GPT-6.1 Sol when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.08.
- gpt-oss-120b can replace GPT-6.1 Sol when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.08.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.25 sample workload cost.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro · MoonshotAI · #1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 · DeepSeek · #2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · DeepSeek · #3
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsOpenAI catalog
Review all tracked OpenAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open OpenAI modelsGoogle catalog
Check other Google models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Google modelsGPT-6.1 Sol is an upgrade to GPT-6 Sol from OpenAI, positioned below the flagship GPT-6 Astra in the GPT-6 series. It is suited for agentic coding, computer use, document-heavy professional...
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is Google's native multimodal video generation and editing model, the generally available successor to Gemini Omni Flash Preview. It is suited for text-to-video, image-to-video, first and...