Both models report the same input price at $0.05 per 1M tokens.
API cost decision in 10 seconds
GPT-5 Nano vs Mistral Small 3
Pick Mistral Small 3 for lower cost; pick GPT-5 Nano only if the larger context window matters more.
Budget verdict
Pick Mistral Small 3 for lower cost; pick GPT-5 Nano only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Mistral Small 3 is estimated at $0.09 vs $0.25 for GPT-5 Nano, saving $0.16 (64% lower).
GPT-5 Nano has more context, but Mistral Small 3 saves $0.16 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $1.6. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Mistral Small 3 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | GPT-5 Nano | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Mistral Small 3 | $0.45 | $0.29 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Mistral Small 3 | $0.45 | $0.13 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Mistral Small 3 | $2.05 | $0.45 |
Mistral Small 3 is $0.32 cheaper per 1M output tokens (80% lower; 5x difference).
GPT-5 Nano has 367.23K more context (12.2x larger).
Mistral Small 3 is $0.16 cheaper on the standard workload (64% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
both models tie on input price; Mistral Small 3 has the lower output price; GPT-5 Nano offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Mistral Small 3 is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.25 for GPT-5 Nano and $0.09 for Mistral Small 3.
Choose GPT-5 Nano when you care most about larger context window.
Choose Mistral Small 3 when you care most about lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Mistral Small 3 is estimated at $0.09 vs $0.25 for GPT-5 Nano, saving $0.16 (64% lower).
- Mistral Small 3 is $0.16 cheaper on the standard workload (64% lower).
- Both models report the same input price at $0.05 per 1M tokens.
- Mistral Small 3 is $0.32 cheaper per 1M output tokens (80% lower; 5x difference).
- GPT-5 Nano has 367.23K more context (12.2x larger).
| Feature | GPT-5 Nano (OpenAI) | Mistral Small 3 (Mistral) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.05 | $0.05 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.4 | $0.08 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.25 | $0.09 |
| Context Window | 400K | 32.77K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #68 | #135 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Mistral Small 3 | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Mistral Small 3 is estimated at $0.09 vs $0.25 for GPT-5 Nano, saving $0.16 (64% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Tie | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Mistral Small 3 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | GPT-5 Nano | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace GPT-5 Nano when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace GPT-5 Nano when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b can replace GPT-5 Nano when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
- gpt-oss-120b can replace GPT-5 Nano when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.13.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite offers 1.05M context with $0.3 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsOpenAI catalog
Review all tracked OpenAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open OpenAI modelsMistral catalog
Check other Mistral models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Mistral modelsGPT-5-Nano is the smallest and fastest variant in the GPT-5 system, optimized for developer tools, rapid interactions, and ultra-low latency environments. While limited in reasoning depth compared to its larger...
Mistral Small 3 is a 24B-parameter language model optimized for low-latency performance across common AI tasks. Released under the Apache 2.0 license, it features both pre-trained and instruction-tuned versions designed...