API cost decision in 10 seconds

GPT-5 Chat vs Claude 3 Haiku

Pick Claude 3 Haiku when budget and context both matter.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Claude 3 Haiku when budget and context both matter.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Claude 3 Haiku is estimated at $0.88 vs $6.25 for GPT-5 Chat, saving $5.38 (86% lower).

Cost-first pickClaude 3 Haiku
Context-first pickClaude 3 Haiku
Sample savings$5.3886%
10x traffic gap$53.75

Claude 3 Haiku is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $53.75. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Claude 3 Haiku stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickGPT-5 ChatClaude 3 Haiku
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputClaude 3 Haiku$11.25$1.88
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputClaude 3 Haiku$11.25$1.5
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputClaude 3 Haiku$51.25$6.5
Cheaper input Claude 3 Haiku $1.25 vs $0.25 / 1M

Claude 3 Haiku is $1 cheaper per 1M input tokens (80% lower; 5x difference).

Cheaper output Claude 3 Haiku $10 vs $1.25 / 1M

Claude 3 Haiku is $8.75 cheaper per 1M output tokens (87.5% lower; 8x difference).

Larger context Claude 3 Haiku 128K vs 200K

Claude 3 Haiku has 72K more context (1.56x larger).

Sample workload Claude 3 Haiku $6.25 vs $0.88

Claude 3 Haiku is $5.38 cheaper on the standard workload (86% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
GPT-5 Chat Calculating… Estimated API cost
Claude 3 Haiku Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Claude 3 Haiku has the lower input price; Claude 3 Haiku has the lower output price; Claude 3 Haiku offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Claude 3 Haiku is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $6.25 for GPT-5 Chat and $0.88 for Claude 3 Haiku.

Best Fit

Choose GPT-5 Chat when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.

Choose Claude 3 Haiku when you care most about lower input-token price, lower output-token price, and larger context window.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Claude 3 Haiku is estimated at $0.88 vs $6.25 for GPT-5 Chat, saving $5.38 (86% lower).
  • Claude 3 Haiku is $5.38 cheaper on the standard workload (86% lower).
  • Claude 3 Haiku is $1 cheaper per 1M input tokens (80% lower; 5x difference).
  • Claude 3 Haiku is $8.75 cheaper per 1M output tokens (87.5% lower; 8x difference).
  • Claude 3 Haiku has 72K more context (1.56x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureGPT-5 Chat
(OpenAI)
Claude 3 Haiku
(Anthropic)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$1.25$0.25
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$10$1.25
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$6.25$0.88
Context Window128K200K
Release Date
Popularity#123#150

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionClaude 3 HaikuOn the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Claude 3 Haiku is estimated at $0.88 vs $6.25 for GPT-5 Chat, saving $5.38 (86% lower).
High-volume input processingClaude 3 HaikuLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsClaude 3 HaikuLower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workClaude 3 HaikuA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace GPT-5 Chat when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace GPT-5 Chat when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • gpt-oss-20b can replace GPT-5 Chat when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
  • gpt-oss-120b can replace GPT-5 Chat when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.13.
Larger context near this budget

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

OpenAI catalog

Review all tracked OpenAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open OpenAI models

Anthropic catalog

Check other Anthropic models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Anthropic models
GPT-5 Chat

GPT-5 Chat is designed for advanced, natural, multimodal, and context-aware conversations for enterprise applications.

Claude 3 Haiku

Claude 3 Haiku is Anthropic's fastest and most compact model for near-instant responsiveness. Quick and accurate targeted performance. See the launch announcement and benchmark results [here](https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-3-haiku) #multimodal