MiniMax M3 is $1.7 cheaper per 1M input tokens (85% lower; 6.67x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
GPT-5.6 Terra vs MiniMax M3
Pick MiniMax M3 for lower cost; pick GPT-5.6 Terra only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick MiniMax M3 for lower cost; pick GPT-5.6 Terra only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, MiniMax M3 is estimated at $0.9 vs $8 for GPT-5.6 Terra, saving $7.1 (88.8% lower).
Cost-first pickMiniMax M3
Context-first pickGPT-5.6 Terra
Sample savings$7.188.8%
10x traffic gap$71
GPT-5.6 Terra has more context, but MiniMax M3 saves $7.1 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $71. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
MiniMax M3 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | GPT-5.6 Terra | MiniMax M3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | MiniMax M3 | $16 | $2.1 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | MiniMax M3 | $14 | $1.5 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | MiniMax M3 | $62 | $6.3 |
MiniMax M3 is $10.8 cheaper per 1M output tokens (90% lower; 10x difference).
GPT-5.6 Terra has 1.42K more context (1x larger).
MiniMax M3 is $7.1 cheaper on the standard workload (88.8% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
MiniMax M3 has the lower input price; MiniMax M3 has the lower output price; GPT-5.6 Terra offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, MiniMax M3 is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $8 for GPT-5.6 Terra and $0.9 for MiniMax M3.
Choose GPT-5.6 Terra when you care most about larger context window.
Choose MiniMax M3 when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, MiniMax M3 is estimated at $0.9 vs $8 for GPT-5.6 Terra, saving $7.1 (88.8% lower).
- MiniMax M3 is $7.1 cheaper on the standard workload (88.8% lower).
- MiniMax M3 is $1.7 cheaper per 1M input tokens (85% lower; 6.67x difference).
- MiniMax M3 is $10.8 cheaper per 1M output tokens (90% lower; 10x difference).
- GPT-5.6 Terra has 1.42K more context (1x larger).
| Feature | GPT-5.6 Terra (OpenAI) | MiniMax M3 (MiniMax) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $2 | $0.3 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $12 | $1.2 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $8 | $0.9 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | MiniMax M3 | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, MiniMax M3 is estimated at $0.9 vs $8 for GPT-5.6 Terra, saving $7.1 (88.8% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | MiniMax M3 | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | MiniMax M3 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | GPT-5.6 Terra | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace GPT-5.6 Terra when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace GPT-5.6 Terra when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b can replace GPT-5.6 Terra when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
- gpt-oss-120b can replace GPT-5.6 Terra when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.12.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.17 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.11 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · DeepSeek · #1
- MiMo-V2.5 · Xiaomi · #2
- Hy3 · Tencent · #3
- Ox Alpha · stealth · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsOpenAI catalog
Review all tracked OpenAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open OpenAI modelsMiniMax catalog
Check other MiniMax models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open MiniMax modelsGPT-5.6 Terra is a balanced model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 series, positioned between the flagship Sol tier and the cost-efficient Luna tier. It is suited for everyday coding, reasoning, and agentic...
MiniMax-M3 is a multimodal foundation model from MiniMax. It supports text, image, and video inputs with text output, a 1M-token context window, and is suited for long-horizon agentic work, coding,...