API cost decision in 10 seconds

🔥GPT-5.6 Sol vs NewQwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Pick Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B for lower cost; pick GPT-5.6 Sol only if the larger context window matters more.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B for lower cost; pick GPT-5.6 Sol only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is estimated at $5 vs $7 for GPT-5.6 Sol, saving $2 (28.6% lower).

Cost-first pickQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Context-first pickGPT-5.6 Sol
Sample savings$228.6%
10x traffic gap$20

GPT-5.6 Sol has more context, but Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B saves $2 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $20. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickGPT-5.6 SolQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputQwen3.8 2.4T A95B$15$13
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputQwen3.8 2.4T A95B$12$8
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputQwen3.8 2.4T A95B$52$32
Cheaper input Tie $2 vs $2 / 1M

Both models report the same input price at $2 per 1M tokens.

Cheaper output Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B $10 vs $6 / 1M

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is $4 cheaper per 1M output tokens (40% lower; 1.67x difference).

Larger context GPT-5.6 Sol 1.05M vs 1.05M

GPT-5.6 Sol has 1.42K more context (1x larger).

Sample workload Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B $7 vs $5

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is $2 cheaper on the standard workload (28.6% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
GPT-5.6 Sol Calculating… Estimated API cost
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

both models tie on input price; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has the lower output price; GPT-5.6 Sol offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $7 for GPT-5.6 Sol and $5 for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B.

Best Fit

Choose GPT-5.6 Sol when you care most about larger context window.

Choose Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B when you care most about lower output-token price.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is estimated at $5 vs $7 for GPT-5.6 Sol, saving $2 (28.6% lower).
  • Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is $2 cheaper on the standard workload (28.6% lower).
  • Both models report the same input price at $2 per 1M tokens.
  • Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is $4 cheaper per 1M output tokens (40% lower; 1.67x difference).
  • GPT-5.6 Sol has 1.42K more context (1x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
Feature🔥GPT-5.6 Sol
(OpenAI)
NewQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
(Qwen)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$2$2
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$10$6
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$7$5
Context Window1.05M1.05M
Release Date
Popularity#15

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionQwen3.8 2.4T A95BOn the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is estimated at $5 vs $7 for GPT-5.6 Sol, saving $2 (28.6% lower).
High-volume input processingTieLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsQwen3.8 2.4T A95BLower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workGPT-5.6 SolA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace GPT-5.6 Sol when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace GPT-5.6 Sol when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • gpt-oss-20b can replace GPT-5.6 Sol when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
  • gpt-oss-120b can replace GPT-5.6 Sol when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.12.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

OpenAI catalog

Review all tracked OpenAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open OpenAI models

Qwen catalog

Check other Qwen models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Qwen models
GPT-5.6 Sol

GPT-5.6 Sol is the flagship model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 series. It is suited for complex reasoning, coding, and agentic workflows, and is particularly strong at command-line and multi-step coding tasks...

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is an open-weight sparse mixture-of-experts model from Qwen and the open-weight variant of [Qwen3.8 Max](/qwen/qwen3.8-max), with 95 billion active parameters out of 2.4 trillion total. It is...