API cost decision in 10 seconds

🔥GPT-5.6 Luna vs Nex-N2-Pro

Pick Nex-N2-Pro for lower cost; pick GPT-5.6 Luna only if the larger context window matters more.

Page updated: 2026-08-17T15:08:04Z Data confirmed: 2026-08-23T11:07:50Z Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Nex-N2-Pro for lower cost; pick GPT-5.6 Luna only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nex-N2-Pro is estimated at $0.75 vs $0.8 for GPT-5.6 Luna, saving $0.05 (6.3% lower).

Cost-first pickNex-N2-Pro

Context-first pickGPT-5.6 Luna

Sample savings$0.056.3%

10x traffic gap$0.5

GPT-5.6 Luna has more context, but Nex-N2-Pro saves $0.05 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.5. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors GPT-5.6 Luna, balanced workload favors Nex-N2-Pro, and output-heavy chatbot favors Nex-N2-Pro.

Workload shape	Token mix	Better pick	GPT-5.6 Luna	Nex-N2-Pro
Input-heavy / RAG	5M input + 500K output	GPT-5.6 Luna	$1.6	$1.75
Balanced workload	1M input + 1M output	Nex-N2-Pro	$1.4	$1.25
Output-heavy chatbot	1M input + 5M output	Nex-N2-Pro	$6.2	$5.25

Cheaper input GPT-5.6 Luna $0.2 vs $0.25 / 1M

GPT-5.6 Luna is $0.05 cheaper per 1M input tokens (20% lower; 1.25x difference).

Cheaper output Nex-N2-Pro $1.2 vs $1 / 1M

Nex-N2-Pro is $0.2 cheaper per 1M output tokens (16.7% lower; 1.2x difference).

Larger context GPT-5.6 Luna 1.05M vs 262.14K

GPT-5.6 Luna has 787.86K more context (4.01x larger).

Sample workload Nex-N2-Pro $0.8 vs $0.75

Nex-N2-Pro is $0.05 cheaper on the standard workload (6.3% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.

Monthly input tokens Monthly output tokens

GPT-5.6 Luna Calculating… Estimated API cost

Nex-N2-Pro Calculating… Estimated API cost

Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

GPT-5.6 Luna has the lower input price; Nex-N2-Pro has the lower output price; GPT-5.6 Luna offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Nex-N2-Pro is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.8 for GPT-5.6 Luna and $0.75 for Nex-N2-Pro.

Best Fit

Choose GPT-5.6 Luna when you care most about lower input-token price, and larger context window.

Choose Nex-N2-Pro when you care most about lower output-token price.

Decision Notes

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nex-N2-Pro is estimated at $0.75 vs $0.8 for GPT-5.6 Luna, saving $0.05 (6.3% lower).
Nex-N2-Pro is $0.05 cheaper on the standard workload (6.3% lower).
GPT-5.6 Luna is $0.05 cheaper per 1M input tokens (20% lower; 1.25x difference).
Nex-N2-Pro is $0.2 cheaper per 1M output tokens (16.7% lower; 1.2x difference).
GPT-5.6 Luna has 787.86K more context (4.01x larger).

Head-to-Head Specs

Feature	🔥GPT-5.6 Luna (OpenAI)	Nex-N2-Pro (Nex AGI)
Input Price prompt tokens per 1M	$0.2	$0.25
Completion Price per 1M tokens	$1.2	$1
Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output	$0.8	$0.75
Context Window	1.05M	262.14K
Release Date	2026-07-09	2026-06-08
Popularity	#6

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use case	Better pick	Why
Budget-constrained production	Nex-N2-Pro	On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nex-N2-Pro is estimated at $0.75 vs $0.8 for GPT-5.6 Luna, saving $0.05 (6.3% lower).
High-volume input processing	GPT-5.6 Luna	Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbots	Nex-N2-Pro	Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document work	GPT-5.6 Luna	A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps

gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace GPT-5.6 Luna when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace GPT-5.6 Luna when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
gpt-oss-20b can replace GPT-5.6 Luna when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
gpt-oss-120b can replace GPT-5.6 Luna when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.12.

Larger context near this budget

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers 1.31M context with $0.17 sample workload cost.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest offers 1.31M context with $0.11 sample workload cost.
Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.25 sample workload cost.

Popular competitors

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 · DeepSeek · #1
MiMo-V2.5 · Xiaomi · #2
Hy3 · Tencent · #3
Ox Alpha · stealth · #4

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

OpenAI catalog

Review all tracked OpenAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open OpenAI models

Nex AGI catalog

Check other Nex AGI models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Nex AGI models

GPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Luna is a fast, cost-efficient model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 series. It is suited for high-volume, latency-sensitive tasks such as chat, classification, and lightweight agentic workflows, providing capable reasoning for...

Nex-N2-Pro

Nex-N2-Pro is an agentic mixture-of-experts model from Nex AGI, with 17B active parameters out of 397B total. Built on the Qwen3.5 architecture, it accepts text and image input and produces...