GPT-5.5 is $25 cheaper per 1M input tokens (83.3% lower; 6x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥GPT-5.5 vs NewClaude Opus 4.7 (Fast)
Pick GPT-5.5 when budget and context both matter.
Budget verdict
Pick GPT-5.5 when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-5.5 is estimated at $20 vs $105 for Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast), saving $85 (81% lower).
GPT-5.5 is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $850. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
GPT-5.5 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | GPT-5.5 | Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | GPT-5.5 | $40 | $225 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | GPT-5.5 | $35 | $180 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | GPT-5.5 | $155 | $780 |
GPT-5.5 is $120 cheaper per 1M output tokens (80% lower; 5x difference).
GPT-5.5 has 50K more context (1.05x larger).
GPT-5.5 is $85 cheaper on the standard workload (81% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
GPT-5.5 has the lower input price; GPT-5.5 has the lower output price; GPT-5.5 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, GPT-5.5 is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $20 for GPT-5.5 and $105 for Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast).
Choose GPT-5.5 when you care most about lower input-token price, lower output-token price, and larger context window.
Choose Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-5.5 is estimated at $20 vs $105 for Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast), saving $85 (81% lower).
- GPT-5.5 is $85 cheaper on the standard workload (81% lower).
- GPT-5.5 is $25 cheaper per 1M input tokens (83.3% lower; 6x difference).
- GPT-5.5 is $120 cheaper per 1M output tokens (80% lower; 5x difference).
- GPT-5.5 has 50K more context (1.05x larger).
| Feature | 🔥GPT-5.5 (OpenAI) | NewClaude Opus 4.7 (Fast) (Anthropic) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $5 | $30 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $30 | $150 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $20 | $105 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #17 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | GPT-5.5 | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-5.5 is estimated at $20 vs $105 for Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast), saving $85 (81% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | GPT-5.5 | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | GPT-5.5 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | GPT-5.5 | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace GPT-5.5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace GPT-5.5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b can replace GPT-5.5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
- gpt-oss-120b can replace GPT-5.5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.13.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsOpenAI catalog
Review all tracked OpenAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open OpenAI modelsAnthropic catalog
Check other Anthropic models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Anthropic modelsGPT-5.5 is OpenAI’s frontier model designed for complex professional workloads, building on GPT-5.4 with stronger reasoning, higher reliability, and improved token efficiency on hard tasks. It features a 1M+ token...
Fast-mode variant of [Opus 4.7](/anthropic/claude-opus-4.7) - identical capabilities with higher output speed at premium 6x pricing. Learn more in Anthropic's docs: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/fast-mode