GPT-5.4 Nano is $29.8 cheaper per 1M input tokens (99.3% lower; 150x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
GPT-5.4 Nano vs NewClaude Opus 4.7 (Fast)
Pick GPT-5.4 Nano for lower cost; pick Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) only if the larger context window matters more.
Budget verdict
Pick GPT-5.4 Nano for lower cost; pick Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-5.4 Nano is estimated at $0.82 vs $105 for Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast), saving $104.17 (99.2% lower).
Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) has more context, but GPT-5.4 Nano saves $104.17 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $1041.75. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
GPT-5.4 Nano stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | GPT-5.4 Nano | Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | GPT-5.4 Nano | $1.62 | $225 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | GPT-5.4 Nano | $1.45 | $180 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | GPT-5.4 Nano | $6.45 | $780 |
GPT-5.4 Nano is $148.75 cheaper per 1M output tokens (99.2% lower; 120x difference).
Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) has 600K more context (2.5x larger).
GPT-5.4 Nano is $104.17 cheaper on the standard workload (99.2% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
GPT-5.4 Nano has the lower input price; GPT-5.4 Nano has the lower output price; Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, GPT-5.4 Nano is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.82 for GPT-5.4 Nano and $105 for Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast).
Choose GPT-5.4 Nano when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
Choose Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) when you care most about larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-5.4 Nano is estimated at $0.82 vs $105 for Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast), saving $104.17 (99.2% lower).
- GPT-5.4 Nano is $104.17 cheaper on the standard workload (99.2% lower).
- GPT-5.4 Nano is $29.8 cheaper per 1M input tokens (99.3% lower; 150x difference).
- GPT-5.4 Nano is $148.75 cheaper per 1M output tokens (99.2% lower; 120x difference).
- Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) has 600K more context (2.5x larger).
| Feature | GPT-5.4 Nano (OpenAI) | NewClaude Opus 4.7 (Fast) (Anthropic) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.2 | $30 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $1.25 | $150 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.82 | $105 |
| Context Window | 400K | 1M |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #32 | #112 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | GPT-5.4 Nano | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-5.4 Nano is estimated at $0.82 vs $105 for Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast), saving $104.17 (99.2% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | GPT-5.4 Nano | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | GPT-5.4 Nano | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace GPT-5.4 Nano when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace GPT-5.4 Nano when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b can replace GPT-5.4 Nano when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
- gpt-oss-120b can replace GPT-5.4 Nano when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.13.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $5 sample workload cost.
- GPT-5.5 offers 1.05M context with $20 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsOpenAI catalog
Review all tracked OpenAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open OpenAI modelsAnthropic catalog
Check other Anthropic models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Anthropic modelsGPT-5.4 nano is the most lightweight and cost-efficient variant of the GPT-5.4 family, optimized for speed-critical and high-volume tasks. It supports text and image inputs and is designed for low-latency...
Fast-mode variant of [Opus 4.7](/anthropic/claude-opus-4.7) - identical capabilities with higher output speed at premium 6x pricing. Learn more in Anthropic's docs: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/fast-mode