Claude Opus Latest is $3 cheaper per 1M input tokens (37.5% lower; 1.6x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
GPT-5.4 Image 2 vs Claude Opus Latest
Pick GPT-5.4 Image 2 for lower cost; pick Claude Opus Latest only if the larger context window matters more.
Pricing data updated:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick GPT-5.4 Image 2 for lower cost; pick Claude Opus Latest only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-5.4 Image 2 is estimated at $15.5 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus Latest, saving $2 (11.4% lower).
Cost-first pickGPT-5.4 Image 2
Context-first pickClaude Opus Latest
Sample savings$211.4%
10x traffic gap$20
Claude Opus Latest has more context, but GPT-5.4 Image 2 saves $2 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $20. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors Claude Opus Latest, balanced workload favors GPT-5.4 Image 2, and output-heavy chatbot favors GPT-5.4 Image 2.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | GPT-5.4 Image 2 | Claude Opus Latest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Claude Opus Latest | $47.5 | $37.5 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | GPT-5.4 Image 2 | $23 | $30 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | GPT-5.4 Image 2 | $83 | $130 |
GPT-5.4 Image 2 is $10 cheaper per 1M output tokens (40% lower; 1.67x difference).
Claude Opus Latest has 728K more context (3.68x larger).
GPT-5.4 Image 2 is $2 cheaper on the standard workload (11.4% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Claude Opus Latest has the lower input price; GPT-5.4 Image 2 has the lower output price; Claude Opus Latest offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, GPT-5.4 Image 2 is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $15.5 for GPT-5.4 Image 2 and $17.5 for Claude Opus Latest.
Choose GPT-5.4 Image 2 when you care most about lower output-token price.
Choose Claude Opus Latest when you care most about lower input-token price, and larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-5.4 Image 2 is estimated at $15.5 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus Latest, saving $2 (11.4% lower).
- GPT-5.4 Image 2 is $2 cheaper on the standard workload (11.4% lower).
- Claude Opus Latest is $3 cheaper per 1M input tokens (37.5% lower; 1.6x difference).
- GPT-5.4 Image 2 is $10 cheaper per 1M output tokens (40% lower; 1.67x difference).
- Claude Opus Latest has 728K more context (3.68x larger).
| Feature | GPT-5.4 Image 2 (OpenAI) | Claude Opus Latest (Anthropic) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $8 | $5 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $15 | $25 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $15.5 | $17.5 |
| Context Window | 272K | 1M |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | GPT-5.4 Image 2 | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-5.4 Image 2 is estimated at $15.5 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus Latest, saving $2 (11.4% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Claude Opus Latest | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | GPT-5.4 Image 2 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Claude Opus Latest | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace GPT-5.4 Image 2 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace GPT-5.4 Image 2 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b can replace GPT-5.4 Image 2 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
- gpt-oss-120b can replace GPT-5.4 Image 2 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.13.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- OpenAI GPT Latest offers 1.05M context with $20 sample workload cost.
- No popular competitor is currently available.
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsOpenAI catalog
Review all tracked OpenAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open OpenAI modelsAnthropic catalog
Check other Anthropic models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Anthropic models[GPT-5.4](https://openrouter.ai/openai/gpt-5.4) Image 2 combines OpenAI's GPT-5.4 model with state-of-the-art image generation capabilities from GPT Image 2. It enables rich multimodal workflows, allowing users to seamlessly move between reasoning, coding, and...
This model always redirects to the latest model in the Claude Opus family.