API cost decision in 10 seconds

GPT-5.3-Codex vs Solar Pro 3

Pick Solar Pro 3 for lower cost; pick GPT-5.3-Codex only if the larger context window matters more.

Pricing data updated:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Solar Pro 3 for lower cost; pick GPT-5.3-Codex only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Solar Pro 3 is estimated at $0.45 vs $8.75 for GPT-5.3-Codex, saving $8.3 (94.9% lower).

Cost-first pickSolar Pro 3
Context-first pickGPT-5.3-Codex
Sample savings$8.394.9%
10x traffic gap$83

GPT-5.3-Codex has more context, but Solar Pro 3 saves $8.3 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $83. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Solar Pro 3 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickGPT-5.3-CodexSolar Pro 3
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputSolar Pro 3$15.75$1.05
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputSolar Pro 3$15.75$0.75
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputSolar Pro 3$71.75$3.15
Cheaper input Solar Pro 3 $1.75 vs $0.15 / 1M

Solar Pro 3 is $1.6 cheaper per 1M input tokens (91.4% lower; 11.7x difference).

Cheaper output Solar Pro 3 $14 vs $0.6 / 1M

Solar Pro 3 is $13.4 cheaper per 1M output tokens (95.7% lower; 23.3x difference).

Larger context GPT-5.3-Codex 400K vs 128K

GPT-5.3-Codex has 272K more context (3.12x larger).

Sample workload Solar Pro 3 $8.75 vs $0.45

Solar Pro 3 is $8.3 cheaper on the standard workload (94.9% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
GPT-5.3-Codex Calculating… Estimated API cost
Solar Pro 3 Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Solar Pro 3 has the lower input price; Solar Pro 3 has the lower output price; GPT-5.3-Codex offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Solar Pro 3 is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $8.75 for GPT-5.3-Codex and $0.45 for Solar Pro 3.

Best Fit

Choose GPT-5.3-Codex when you care most about larger context window.

Choose Solar Pro 3 when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Solar Pro 3 is estimated at $0.45 vs $8.75 for GPT-5.3-Codex, saving $8.3 (94.9% lower).
  • Solar Pro 3 is $8.3 cheaper on the standard workload (94.9% lower).
  • Solar Pro 3 is $1.6 cheaper per 1M input tokens (91.4% lower; 11.7x difference).
  • Solar Pro 3 is $13.4 cheaper per 1M output tokens (95.7% lower; 23.3x difference).
  • GPT-5.3-Codex has 272K more context (3.12x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureGPT-5.3-Codex
(OpenAI)
Solar Pro 3
(Upstage)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$1.75$0.15
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$14$0.6
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$8.75$0.45
Context Window400K128K
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionSolar Pro 3On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Solar Pro 3 is estimated at $0.45 vs $8.75 for GPT-5.3-Codex, saving $8.3 (94.9% lower).
High-volume input processingSolar Pro 3Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsSolar Pro 3Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workGPT-5.3-CodexA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace GPT-5.3-Codex when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace GPT-5.3-Codex when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • gpt-oss-20b can replace GPT-5.3-Codex when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
  • gpt-oss-120b can replace GPT-5.3-Codex when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.13.
Larger context near this budget
  • Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
  • Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $5 sample workload cost.
  • Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
  • GPT-5.4 offers 1.05M context with $10 sample workload cost.
Popular competitors
  • No popular competitor is currently available.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

OpenAI catalog

Review all tracked OpenAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open OpenAI models

Upstage catalog

Check other Upstage models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Upstage models
GPT-5.3-Codex

GPT-5.3-Codex is OpenAI’s most advanced agentic coding model, combining the frontier software engineering performance of GPT-5.2-Codex with the broader reasoning and professional knowledge capabilities of GPT-5.2. It achieves state-of-the-art results...

Solar Pro 3

Solar Pro 3 is Upstage's powerful Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language model. With 102B total parameters and 12B active parameters per forward pass, it delivers exceptional performance while maintaining computational efficiency. Optimized...