GPT-5.1-Codex-Max is $0.5 cheaper per 1M input tokens (28.6% lower; 1.4x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
GPT-5.3-Codex vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
Pick GPT-5.1-Codex-Max when budget is the priority.
Budget verdict
Pick GPT-5.1-Codex-Max when budget is the priority.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-5.1-Codex-Max is estimated at $6.25 vs $8.75 for GPT-5.3-Codex, saving $2.5 (28.6% lower).
The reported context window is tied, so cost and provider fit carry more weight. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $25. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | GPT-5.3-Codex | GPT-5.1-Codex-Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | GPT-5.1-Codex-Max | $15.75 | $11.25 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | GPT-5.1-Codex-Max | $15.75 | $11.25 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | GPT-5.1-Codex-Max | $71.75 | $51.25 |
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max is $4 cheaper per 1M output tokens (28.6% lower; 1.4x difference).
Both models report the same context window at 400K tokens.
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max is $2.5 cheaper on the standard workload (28.6% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max has the lower input price; GPT-5.1-Codex-Max has the lower output price; both models report the same context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, GPT-5.1-Codex-Max is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $8.75 for GPT-5.3-Codex and $6.25 for GPT-5.1-Codex-Max.
Choose GPT-5.3-Codex when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
Choose GPT-5.1-Codex-Max when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-5.1-Codex-Max is estimated at $6.25 vs $8.75 for GPT-5.3-Codex, saving $2.5 (28.6% lower).
- GPT-5.1-Codex-Max is $2.5 cheaper on the standard workload (28.6% lower).
- GPT-5.1-Codex-Max is $0.5 cheaper per 1M input tokens (28.6% lower; 1.4x difference).
- GPT-5.1-Codex-Max is $4 cheaper per 1M output tokens (28.6% lower; 1.4x difference).
- Both models report the same context window at 400K tokens.
| Feature | GPT-5.3-Codex (OpenAI) | GPT-5.1-Codex-Max (OpenAI) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $1.75 | $1.25 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $14 | $10 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $8.75 | $6.25 |
| Context Window | 400K | 400K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | GPT-5.1-Codex-Max | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-5.1-Codex-Max is estimated at $6.25 vs $8.75 for GPT-5.3-Codex, saving $2.5 (28.6% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | GPT-5.1-Codex-Max | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | GPT-5.1-Codex-Max | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Tie | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace GPT-5.3-Codex when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace GPT-5.3-Codex when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b can replace GPT-5.3-Codex when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
- gpt-oss-120b can replace GPT-5.3-Codex when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.13.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- GPT-5.4 offers 1.05M context with $10 sample workload cost.
- No popular competitor is currently available.
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsOpenAI catalog
Review all tracked OpenAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open OpenAI modelsGPT-5.3-Codex is OpenAI’s most advanced agentic coding model, combining the frontier software engineering performance of GPT-5.2-Codex with the broader reasoning and professional knowledge capabilities of GPT-5.2. It achieves state-of-the-art results...
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max is OpenAI’s latest agentic coding model, designed for long-running, high-context software development tasks. It is based on an updated version of the 5.1 reasoning stack and trained on agentic...