Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is $1.7 cheaper per 1M input tokens (97.1% lower; 35x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
GPT-5.3-Codex vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B for lower cost; pick GPT-5.3-Codex only if the larger context window matters more.
Pricing data updated:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B for lower cost; pick GPT-5.3-Codex only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is estimated at $0.15 vs $8.75 for GPT-5.3-Codex, saving $8.6 (98.3% lower).
Cost-first pickNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Context-first pickGPT-5.3-Codex
Sample savings$8.698.3%
10x traffic gap$86
GPT-5.3-Codex has more context, but Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B saves $8.6 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $86. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | GPT-5.3-Codex | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | $15.75 | $0.35 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | $15.75 | $0.25 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | $71.75 | $1.05 |
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is $13.8 cheaper per 1M output tokens (98.6% lower; 70x difference).
GPT-5.3-Codex has 137.86K more context (1.53x larger).
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is $8.6 cheaper on the standard workload (98.3% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has the lower input price; Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has the lower output price; GPT-5.3-Codex offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $8.75 for GPT-5.3-Codex and $0.15 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B.
Choose GPT-5.3-Codex when you care most about larger context window.
Choose Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is estimated at $0.15 vs $8.75 for GPT-5.3-Codex, saving $8.6 (98.3% lower).
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is $8.6 cheaper on the standard workload (98.3% lower).
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is $1.7 cheaper per 1M input tokens (97.1% lower; 35x difference).
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is $13.8 cheaper per 1M output tokens (98.6% lower; 70x difference).
- GPT-5.3-Codex has 137.86K more context (1.53x larger).
| Feature | GPT-5.3-Codex (OpenAI) | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (NVIDIA) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $1.75 | $0.05 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $14 | $0.2 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $8.75 | $0.15 |
| Context Window | 400K | 262.14K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is estimated at $0.15 vs $8.75 for GPT-5.3-Codex, saving $8.6 (98.3% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | GPT-5.3-Codex | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace GPT-5.3-Codex when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace GPT-5.3-Codex when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b can replace GPT-5.3-Codex when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
- gpt-oss-120b can replace GPT-5.3-Codex when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.13.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- GPT-5.4 offers 1.05M context with $10 sample workload cost.
- No popular competitor is currently available.
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsOpenAI catalog
Review all tracked OpenAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open OpenAI modelsNVIDIA catalog
Check other NVIDIA models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open NVIDIA modelsGPT-5.3-Codex is OpenAI’s most advanced agentic coding model, combining the frontier software engineering performance of GPT-5.2-Codex with the broader reasoning and professional knowledge capabilities of GPT-5.2. It achieves state-of-the-art results...
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is a small language MoE model with highest compute efficiency and accuracy for developers to build specialized agentic AI systems. The model is fully...