API cost decision in 10 seconds

GPT-5.2 vs o3 Mini

Pick o3 Mini for lower cost; pick GPT-5.2 only if the larger context window matters more.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick o3 Mini for lower cost; pick GPT-5.2 only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, o3 Mini is estimated at $3.3 vs $8.75 for GPT-5.2, saving $5.45 (62.3% lower).

Cost-first picko3 Mini
Context-first pickGPT-5.2
Sample savings$5.4562.3%
10x traffic gap$54.5

GPT-5.2 has more context, but o3 Mini saves $5.45 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $54.5. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

o3 Mini stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickGPT-5.2o3 Mini
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputo3 Mini$15.75$7.7
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputo3 Mini$15.75$5.5
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputo3 Mini$71.75$23.1
Cheaper input o3 Mini $1.75 vs $1.1 / 1M

o3 Mini is $0.65 cheaper per 1M input tokens (37.1% lower; 1.59x difference).

Cheaper output o3 Mini $14 vs $4.4 / 1M

o3 Mini is $9.6 cheaper per 1M output tokens (68.6% lower; 3.18x difference).

Larger context GPT-5.2 400K vs 200K

GPT-5.2 has 200K more context (2x larger).

Sample workload o3 Mini $8.75 vs $3.3

o3 Mini is $5.45 cheaper on the standard workload (62.3% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
GPT-5.2 Calculating… Estimated API cost
o3 Mini Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

o3 Mini has the lower input price; o3 Mini has the lower output price; GPT-5.2 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, o3 Mini is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $8.75 for GPT-5.2 and $3.3 for o3 Mini.

Best Fit

Choose GPT-5.2 when you care most about larger context window.

Choose o3 Mini when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, o3 Mini is estimated at $3.3 vs $8.75 for GPT-5.2, saving $5.45 (62.3% lower).
  • o3 Mini is $5.45 cheaper on the standard workload (62.3% lower).
  • o3 Mini is $0.65 cheaper per 1M input tokens (37.1% lower; 1.59x difference).
  • o3 Mini is $9.6 cheaper per 1M output tokens (68.6% lower; 3.18x difference).
  • GPT-5.2 has 200K more context (2x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureGPT-5.2
(OpenAI)
o3 Mini
(OpenAI)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$1.75$1.1
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$14$4.4
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$8.75$3.3
Context Window400K200K
Release Date
Popularity#66#120

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productiono3 MiniOn the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, o3 Mini is estimated at $3.3 vs $8.75 for GPT-5.2, saving $5.45 (62.3% lower).
High-volume input processingo3 MiniLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotso3 MiniLower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workGPT-5.2A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace GPT-5.2 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace GPT-5.2 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • gpt-oss-20b can replace GPT-5.2 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
  • gpt-oss-120b can replace GPT-5.2 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.13.
Larger context near this budget
  • Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
  • Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
  • Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $5 sample workload cost.
  • GPT-5.4 offers 1.05M context with $10 sample workload cost.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

OpenAI catalog

Review all tracked OpenAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open OpenAI models
GPT-5.2

GPT-5.2 is the latest frontier-grade model in the GPT-5 series, offering stronger agentic and long context perfomance compared to GPT-5.1. It uses adaptive reasoning to allocate computation dynamically, responding quickly...

o3 Mini

OpenAI o3-mini is a cost-efficient language model optimized for STEM reasoning tasks, particularly excelling in science, mathematics, and coding. This model supports the `reasoning_effort` parameter, which can be set to...