Ministral 3 14B 2512 is $0.05 cheaper per 1M input tokens (20% lower; 1.25x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini vs Ministral 3 14B 2512
Pick Ministral 3 14B 2512 for lower cost; pick GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Ministral 3 14B 2512 for lower cost; pick GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Ministral 3 14B 2512 is estimated at $0.3 vs $1.25 for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini, saving $0.95 (76% lower).
Cost-first pickMinistral 3 14B 2512
Context-first pickGPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Sample savings$0.9576%
10x traffic gap$9.5
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has more context, but Ministral 3 14B 2512 saves $0.95 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $9.5. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Ministral 3 14B 2512 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini | Ministral 3 14B 2512 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Ministral 3 14B 2512 | $2.25 | $1.1 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Ministral 3 14B 2512 | $2.25 | $0.4 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Ministral 3 14B 2512 | $10.25 | $1.2 |
Ministral 3 14B 2512 is $1.8 cheaper per 1M output tokens (90% lower; 10x difference).
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has 137.86K more context (1.53x larger).
Ministral 3 14B 2512 is $0.95 cheaper on the standard workload (76% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Ministral 3 14B 2512 has the lower input price; Ministral 3 14B 2512 has the lower output price; GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Ministral 3 14B 2512 is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $1.25 for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and $0.3 for Ministral 3 14B 2512.
Choose GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini when you care most about larger context window.
Choose Ministral 3 14B 2512 when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Ministral 3 14B 2512 is estimated at $0.3 vs $1.25 for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini, saving $0.95 (76% lower).
- Ministral 3 14B 2512 is $0.95 cheaper on the standard workload (76% lower).
- Ministral 3 14B 2512 is $0.05 cheaper per 1M input tokens (20% lower; 1.25x difference).
- Ministral 3 14B 2512 is $1.8 cheaper per 1M output tokens (90% lower; 10x difference).
- GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has 137.86K more context (1.53x larger).
| Feature | GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini (OpenAI) | Ministral 3 14B 2512 (Mistral) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.25 | $0.2 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $2 | $0.2 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $1.25 | $0.3 |
| Context Window | 400K | 262.14K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #141 | #143 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Ministral 3 14B 2512 | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Ministral 3 14B 2512 is estimated at $0.3 vs $1.25 for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini, saving $0.95 (76% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Ministral 3 14B 2512 | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Ministral 3 14B 2512 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b can replace GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
- gpt-oss-120b can replace GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.13.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro offers 1.05M context with $0.87 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsOpenAI catalog
Review all tracked OpenAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open OpenAI modelsMistral catalog
Check other Mistral models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Mistral modelsGPT-5.1-Codex-Mini is a smaller and faster version of GPT-5.1-Codex
The largest model in the Ministral 3 family, Ministral 3 14B offers frontier capabilities and performance comparable to its larger Mistral Small 3.2 24B counterpart. A powerful and efficient language...