Nova Micro 1.0 is $0.11 cheaper per 1M input tokens (76.7% lower; 4.29x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
🔥GPT-4o-mini vs Nova Micro 1.0
Pick Nova Micro 1.0 when budget is the priority.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Nova Micro 1.0 when budget is the priority.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nova Micro 1.0 is estimated at $0.11 vs $0.45 for GPT-4o-mini, saving $0.34 (76.7% lower).
Cost-first pickNova Micro 1.0
Context-first pickBoth models
Sample savings$0.3476.7%
10x traffic gap$3.45
The reported context window is tied, so cost and provider fit carry more weight. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $3.45. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Nova Micro 1.0 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | GPT-4o-mini | Nova Micro 1.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Nova Micro 1.0 | $1.05 | $0.25 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Nova Micro 1.0 | $0.75 | $0.18 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Nova Micro 1.0 | $3.15 | $0.74 |
Nova Micro 1.0 is $0.46 cheaper per 1M output tokens (76.7% lower; 4.29x difference).
Both models report the same context window at 128K tokens.
Nova Micro 1.0 is $0.34 cheaper on the standard workload (76.7% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Nova Micro 1.0 has the lower input price; Nova Micro 1.0 has the lower output price; both models report the same context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Nova Micro 1.0 is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.45 for GPT-4o-mini and $0.11 for Nova Micro 1.0.
Choose GPT-4o-mini when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
Choose Nova Micro 1.0 when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nova Micro 1.0 is estimated at $0.11 vs $0.45 for GPT-4o-mini, saving $0.34 (76.7% lower).
- Nova Micro 1.0 is $0.34 cheaper on the standard workload (76.7% lower).
- Nova Micro 1.0 is $0.11 cheaper per 1M input tokens (76.7% lower; 4.29x difference).
- Nova Micro 1.0 is $0.46 cheaper per 1M output tokens (76.7% lower; 4.29x difference).
- Both models report the same context window at 128K tokens.
| Feature | 🔥GPT-4o-mini (OpenAI) | Nova Micro 1.0 (Amazon) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.15 | $0.035 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.6 | $0.14 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.45 | $0.11 |
| Context Window | 128K | 128K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #16 | #146 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Nova Micro 1.0 | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nova Micro 1.0 is estimated at $0.11 vs $0.45 for GPT-4o-mini, saving $0.34 (76.7% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Nova Micro 1.0 | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Nova Micro 1.0 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Tie | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace GPT-4o-mini when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace GPT-4o-mini when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b can replace GPT-4o-mini when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
- gpt-oss-120b can replace GPT-4o-mini when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.13.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite offers 1.05M context with $0.3 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsOpenAI catalog
Review all tracked OpenAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open OpenAI modelsAmazon catalog
Check other Amazon models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Amazon modelsGPT-4o mini is OpenAI's newest model after [GPT-4 Omni](/models/openai/gpt-4o), supporting both text and image inputs with text outputs. As their most advanced small model, it is many multiples more affordable...
Amazon Nova Micro 1.0 is a text-only model that delivers the lowest latency responses in the Amazon Nova family of models at a very low cost. With a context length...