Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is $0.1 cheaper per 1M input tokens (25% lower; 1.33x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
GPT-4.1 Mini vs Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Pick GPT-4.1 Mini when budget and context both matter.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick GPT-4.1 Mini when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-4.1 Mini is estimated at $1.2 vs $1.55 for Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image), saving $0.35 (22.6% lower).
Cost-first pickGPT-4.1 Mini
Context-first pickGPT-4.1 Mini
Sample savings$0.3522.6%
10x traffic gap$3.5
GPT-4.1 Mini is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $3.5. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image), balanced workload favors GPT-4.1 Mini, and output-heavy chatbot favors GPT-4.1 Mini.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | GPT-4.1 Mini | Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) | $2.8 | $2.75 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | GPT-4.1 Mini | $2 | $2.8 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | GPT-4.1 Mini | $8.4 | $12.8 |
GPT-4.1 Mini is $0.9 cheaper per 1M output tokens (36% lower; 1.56x difference).
GPT-4.1 Mini has 1.01M more context (32x larger).
GPT-4.1 Mini is $0.35 cheaper on the standard workload (22.6% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) has the lower input price; GPT-4.1 Mini has the lower output price; GPT-4.1 Mini offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, GPT-4.1 Mini is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $1.2 for GPT-4.1 Mini and $1.55 for Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image).
Choose GPT-4.1 Mini when you care most about lower output-token price, and larger context window.
Choose Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) when you care most about lower input-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-4.1 Mini is estimated at $1.2 vs $1.55 for Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image), saving $0.35 (22.6% lower).
- GPT-4.1 Mini is $0.35 cheaper on the standard workload (22.6% lower).
- Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is $0.1 cheaper per 1M input tokens (25% lower; 1.33x difference).
- GPT-4.1 Mini is $0.9 cheaper per 1M output tokens (36% lower; 1.56x difference).
- GPT-4.1 Mini has 1.01M more context (32x larger).
| Feature | GPT-4.1 Mini (OpenAI) | Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) (Google) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.4 | $0.3 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $1.6 | $2.5 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $1.2 | $1.55 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 32.77K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #51 | #121 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | GPT-4.1 Mini | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GPT-4.1 Mini is estimated at $1.2 vs $1.55 for Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image), saving $0.35 (22.6% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | GPT-4.1 Mini | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | GPT-4.1 Mini | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- gpt-oss-120b (free) can replace GPT-4.1 Mini when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b (free) can replace GPT-4.1 Mini when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- gpt-oss-20b can replace GPT-4.1 Mini when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.1.
- gpt-oss-120b can replace GPT-4.1 Mini when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.13.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro offers 1.05M context with $0.87 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsOpenAI catalog
Review all tracked OpenAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open OpenAI modelsGoogle catalog
Check other Google models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Google modelsGPT-4.1 Mini is a mid-sized model delivering performance competitive with GPT-4o at substantially lower latency and cost. It retains a 1 million token context window and scores 45.1% on hard...
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image, a.k.a. "Nano Banana," is now generally available. It is a state of the art image generation model with contextual understanding. It is capable of image generation,...