Nemotron 3 Super is $4.91 cheaper per 1M input tokens (98.2% lower; 55.6x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Nemotron 3 Super vs Claude Opus 4.6
Pick Nemotron 3 Super when budget is the priority.
Budget verdict
Pick Nemotron 3 Super when budget is the priority.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nemotron 3 Super is estimated at $0.32 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus 4.6, saving $17.18 (98.2% lower).
The reported context window is tied, so cost and provider fit carry more weight. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $171.85. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Nemotron 3 Super stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Nemotron 3 Super | Claude Opus 4.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Nemotron 3 Super | $0.68 | $37.5 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Nemotron 3 Super | $0.54 | $30 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Nemotron 3 Super | $2.34 | $130 |
Nemotron 3 Super is $24.55 cheaper per 1M output tokens (98.2% lower; 55.6x difference).
Both models report the same context window at 1M tokens.
Nemotron 3 Super is $17.18 cheaper on the standard workload (98.2% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Nemotron 3 Super has the lower input price; Nemotron 3 Super has the lower output price; both models report the same context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.32 for Nemotron 3 Super and $17.5 for Claude Opus 4.6.
Choose Nemotron 3 Super when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
Choose Claude Opus 4.6 when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nemotron 3 Super is estimated at $0.32 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus 4.6, saving $17.18 (98.2% lower).
- Nemotron 3 Super is $17.18 cheaper on the standard workload (98.2% lower).
- Nemotron 3 Super is $4.91 cheaper per 1M input tokens (98.2% lower; 55.6x difference).
- Nemotron 3 Super is $24.55 cheaper per 1M output tokens (98.2% lower; 55.6x difference).
- Both models report the same context window at 1M tokens.
| Feature | Nemotron 3 Super (NVIDIA) | Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.09 | $5 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.45 | $25 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.32 | $17.5 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Nemotron 3 Super | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nemotron 3 Super is estimated at $0.32 vs $17.5 for Claude Opus 4.6, saving $17.18 (98.2% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Nemotron 3 Super | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Nemotron 3 Super | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Tie | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) can replace Nemotron 3 Super when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Nemotron 3 Super (free) can replace Nemotron 3 Super when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (free) can replace Nemotron 3 Super when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free) can replace Nemotron 3 Super when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- OpenAI GPT Latest offers 1.05M context with $20 sample workload cost.
- No popular competitor is currently available.
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsNVIDIA catalog
Review all tracked NVIDIA models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open NVIDIA modelsAnthropic catalog
Check other Anthropic models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Anthropic modelsNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super is a 120B-parameter open hybrid MoE model, activating just 12B parameters for maximum compute efficiency and accuracy in complex multi-agent applications. Built on a hybrid Mamba-Transformer...
Opus 4.6 is Anthropic’s strongest model for coding and long-running professional tasks. It is built for agents that operate across entire workflows rather than single prompts, making it especially effective...