Both models report the same input price at $0.05 per 1M tokens.
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Mistral Small 3
Pick Mistral Small 3 for lower cost; pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B only if the larger context window matters more.
Budget verdict
Pick Mistral Small 3 for lower cost; pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Mistral Small 3 is estimated at $0.09 vs $0.15 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, saving $0.06 (40% lower).
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has more context, but Mistral Small 3 saves $0.06 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.6. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Mistral Small 3 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Mistral Small 3 | $0.35 | $0.29 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Mistral Small 3 | $0.25 | $0.13 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Mistral Small 3 | $1.05 | $0.45 |
Mistral Small 3 is $0.12 cheaper per 1M output tokens (60% lower; 2.5x difference).
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has 229.38K more context (8x larger).
Mistral Small 3 is $0.06 cheaper on the standard workload (40% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
both models tie on input price; Mistral Small 3 has the lower output price; Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Mistral Small 3 is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.15 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and $0.09 for Mistral Small 3.
Choose Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B when you care most about larger context window.
Choose Mistral Small 3 when you care most about lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Mistral Small 3 is estimated at $0.09 vs $0.15 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, saving $0.06 (40% lower).
- Mistral Small 3 is $0.06 cheaper on the standard workload (40% lower).
- Both models report the same input price at $0.05 per 1M tokens.
- Mistral Small 3 is $0.12 cheaper per 1M output tokens (60% lower; 2.5x difference).
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has 229.38K more context (8x larger).
| Feature | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (NVIDIA) | Mistral Small 3 (Mistral) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.05 | $0.05 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.2 | $0.08 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.15 | $0.09 |
| Context Window | 262.14K | 32.77K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #95 | #135 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Mistral Small 3 | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Mistral Small 3 is estimated at $0.09 vs $0.15 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, saving $0.06 (40% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Tie | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Mistral Small 3 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Nemotron 3 Super (free) can replace Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (free) can replace Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) can replace Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (free) can replace Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- Lyria 3 Clip Preview offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- Lyria 3 Pro Preview offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsNVIDIA catalog
Review all tracked NVIDIA models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open NVIDIA modelsMistral catalog
Check other Mistral models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Mistral modelsNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is a small language MoE model with highest compute efficiency and accuracy for developers to build specialized agentic AI systems. The model is fully...
Mistral Small 3 is a 24B-parameter language model optimized for low-latency performance across common AI tasks. Released under the Apache 2.0 license, it features both pre-trained and instruction-tuned versions designed...