Both models report the same input price at $0.15 per 1M tokens.
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch)
Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when budget is the priority.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when budget is the priority.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is estimated at $0.4 vs $0.78 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch), saving $0.38 (48.4% lower).
Cost-first pickNemotron 3.5 Super VL
Context-first pickBoth models
Sample savings$0.3848.4%
10x traffic gap$3.75
The reported context window is tied, so cost and provider fit carry more weight. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $3.75. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | $1 | $1.38 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | $0.65 | $1.4 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | $2.65 | $6.4 |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is $0.75 cheaper per 1M output tokens (60% lower; 2.5x difference).
Both models report the same context window at 1.05M tokens.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is $0.38 cheaper on the standard workload (48.4% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
both models tie on input price; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the lower output price; both models report the same context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.4 for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and $0.78 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch).
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when you care most about lower output-token price.
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is estimated at $0.4 vs $0.78 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch), saving $0.38 (48.4% lower).
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is $0.38 cheaper on the standard workload (48.4% lower).
- Both models report the same input price at $0.15 per 1M tokens.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is $0.75 cheaper per 1M output tokens (60% lower; 2.5x difference).
- Both models report the same context window at 1.05M tokens.
| Feature | NewNemotron 3.5 Super VL (NVIDIA) | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) (Google) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.15 | $0.15 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.5 | $1.25 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.4 | $0.78 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is estimated at $0.4 vs $0.78 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch), saving $0.38 (48.4% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Tie | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Tie | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Nemotron 3 Ultra (free) can replace Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (free) can replace Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) can replace Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety (free) can replace Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.47 sample workload cost.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.28 sample workload cost.
- GPT-6 Luna offers 1.05M context with $0.35 sample workload cost.
- GPT-6 Luna Pro offers 1.05M context with $0.35 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Step 5 Preview · StepFun · #2
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #3
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash · Xiaomi · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsNVIDIA catalog
Review all tracked NVIDIA models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open NVIDIA modelsGoogle catalog
Check other Google models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Google modelsNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is an open multimodal mixture-of-experts model from NVIDIA, with 12B active parameters out of 120B total. It takes text, images, documents, GUI screenshots, and video...
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is a high-efficiency model from Google with upgraded agentic capabilities. It is suited for subagents that execute focused tasks within complex, multi-agent workflows.