Nex-N2-Pro (free) is free for input tokens while Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.4 per 1M tokens.
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewNex-N2-Pro (free) vs Mistral Medium 3.1
Pick Nex-N2-Pro (free) when budget and context both matter.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Nex-N2-Pro (free) when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nex-N2-Pro (free) is estimated at $0 vs $1.4 for Mistral Medium 3.1, saving $1.4 (100% lower).
Cost-first pickNex-N2-Pro (free)
Context-first pickNex-N2-Pro (free)
Sample savings$1.4100%
10x traffic gap$14
Nex-N2-Pro (free) is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $14. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Nex-N2-Pro (free) stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Nex-N2-Pro (free) | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Nex-N2-Pro (free) | $0 | $3 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Nex-N2-Pro (free) | $0 | $2.4 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Nex-N2-Pro (free) | $0 | $10.4 |
Nex-N2-Pro (free) is free for output tokens while Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $2 per 1M tokens.
Nex-N2-Pro (free) has 131.07K more context (2x larger).
Nex-N2-Pro (free) is free for the standard workload while the other model is estimated at $1.4.
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Nex-N2-Pro (free) has the lower input price; Nex-N2-Pro (free) has the lower output price; Nex-N2-Pro (free) offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Nex-N2-Pro (free) is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0 for Nex-N2-Pro (free) and $1.4 for Mistral Medium 3.1.
Choose Nex-N2-Pro (free) when you care most about lower input-token price, lower output-token price, and larger context window.
Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nex-N2-Pro (free) is estimated at $0 vs $1.4 for Mistral Medium 3.1, saving $1.4 (100% lower).
- Nex-N2-Pro (free) is free for the standard workload while the other model is estimated at $1.4.
- Nex-N2-Pro (free) is free for input tokens while Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.4 per 1M tokens.
- Nex-N2-Pro (free) is free for output tokens while Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $2 per 1M tokens.
- Nex-N2-Pro (free) has 131.07K more context (2x larger).
| Feature | NewNex-N2-Pro (free) (Nex AGI) | Mistral Medium 3.1 (Mistral) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0 | $0.4 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0 | $2 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0 | $1.4 |
| Context Window | 262.14K | 131.07K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #84 | #150 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Nex-N2-Pro (free) | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Nex-N2-Pro (free) is estimated at $0 vs $1.4 for Mistral Medium 3.1, saving $1.4 (100% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Nex-N2-Pro (free) | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Nex-N2-Pro (free) | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Nex-N2-Pro (free) | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Mistral Nemo can replace Mistral Medium 3.1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.04.
- Mistral Small 3 can replace Mistral Medium 3.1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.09.
- Ministral 3 3B 2512 can replace Mistral Medium 3.1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.15.
- Mistral Small 3.2 24B can replace Mistral Medium 3.1 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.17.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.25 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- MiMo-V2.5 offers 1.05M context with $0.28 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- MiMo-V2.5 · Xiaomi · #3
- MiniMax M3 · MiniMax · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsNex AGI catalog
Review all tracked Nex AGI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Nex AGI modelsMistral catalog
Check other Mistral models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Mistral modelsNex-N2-Pro is an agentic mixture-of-experts model from Nex AGI, with 17B active parameters out of 397B total. Built on the Qwen3.5 architecture, it accepts text and image input and produces...
Mistral Medium 3.1 is an updated version of Mistral Medium 3, which is a high-performance enterprise-grade language model designed to deliver frontier-level capabilities at significantly reduced operational cost. It balances...