MoonshotAI Kimi Latest is $0.25 cheaper per 1M input tokens (25.5% lower; 1.34x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewMoonshotAI Kimi Latest vs GLM 5.1
Pick MoonshotAI Kimi Latest when budget and context both matter.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick MoonshotAI Kimi Latest when budget and context both matter.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, MoonshotAI Kimi Latest is estimated at $2.48 vs $2.52 for GLM 5.1, saving $0.04 (1.8% lower).
Cost-first pickMoonshotAI Kimi Latest
Context-first pickMoonshotAI Kimi Latest
Sample savings$0.041.8%
10x traffic gap$0.45
MoonshotAI Kimi Latest is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.45. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors MoonshotAI Kimi Latest, balanced workload favors GLM 5.1, and output-heavy chatbot favors GLM 5.1.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | MoonshotAI Kimi Latest | GLM 5.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | MoonshotAI Kimi Latest | $5.39 | $6.44 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | GLM 5.1 | $4.22 | $4.06 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | GLM 5.1 | $18.18 | $16.38 |
GLM 5.1 is $0.41 cheaper per 1M output tokens (11.7% lower; 1.13x difference).
MoonshotAI Kimi Latest has 59.39K more context (1.29x larger).
MoonshotAI Kimi Latest is $0.04 cheaper on the standard workload (1.8% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
MoonshotAI Kimi Latest has the lower input price; GLM 5.1 has the lower output price; MoonshotAI Kimi Latest offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, MoonshotAI Kimi Latest is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $2.48 for MoonshotAI Kimi Latest and $2.52 for GLM 5.1.
Choose MoonshotAI Kimi Latest when you care most about lower input-token price, and larger context window.
Choose GLM 5.1 when you care most about lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, MoonshotAI Kimi Latest is estimated at $2.48 vs $2.52 for GLM 5.1, saving $0.04 (1.8% lower).
- MoonshotAI Kimi Latest is $0.04 cheaper on the standard workload (1.8% lower).
- MoonshotAI Kimi Latest is $0.25 cheaper per 1M input tokens (25.5% lower; 1.34x difference).
- GLM 5.1 is $0.41 cheaper per 1M output tokens (11.7% lower; 1.13x difference).
- MoonshotAI Kimi Latest has 59.39K more context (1.29x larger).
| Feature | NewMoonshotAI Kimi Latest (MoonshotAI) | GLM 5.1 (Z.ai) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.73 | $0.98 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $3.49 | $3.08 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $2.48 | $2.52 |
| Context Window | 262.14K | 202.75K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | MoonshotAI Kimi Latest | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, MoonshotAI Kimi Latest is estimated at $2.48 vs $2.52 for GLM 5.1, saving $0.04 (1.8% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | MoonshotAI Kimi Latest | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | GLM 5.1 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | MoonshotAI Kimi Latest | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Kimi K2.5 can replace MoonshotAI Kimi Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.35.
- Kimi K2 0711 can replace MoonshotAI Kimi Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.72.
- Kimi K2 Thinking can replace MoonshotAI Kimi Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.85.
- Kimi K2 0905 can replace MoonshotAI Kimi Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.85.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsMoonshotAI catalog
Review all tracked MoonshotAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open MoonshotAI modelsZ.ai catalog
Check other Z.ai models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Z.ai modelsThis model always redirects to the latest model in the MoonshotAI Kimi family.
GLM-5.1 delivers a major leap in coding capability, with particularly significant gains in handling long-horizon tasks. Unlike previous models built around minute-level interactions, GLM-5.1 can work independently and continuously on...