API cost decision in 10 seconds

NewMoonshotAI Kimi Latest vs GLM 4.6V

Pick GLM 4.6V for lower cost; pick MoonshotAI Kimi Latest only if the larger context window matters more.

Pricing data updated:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick GLM 4.6V for lower cost; pick MoonshotAI Kimi Latest only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 4.6V is estimated at $0.75 vs $2.48 for MoonshotAI Kimi Latest, saving $1.73 (69.7% lower).

Cost-first pickGLM 4.6V
Context-first pickMoonshotAI Kimi Latest
Sample savings$1.7369.7%
10x traffic gap$17.25

MoonshotAI Kimi Latest has more context, but GLM 4.6V saves $1.73 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $17.25. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

GLM 4.6V stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickMoonshotAI Kimi LatestGLM 4.6V
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputGLM 4.6V$5.39$1.95
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputGLM 4.6V$4.22$1.2
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputGLM 4.6V$18.18$4.8
Cheaper input GLM 4.6V $0.73 vs $0.3 / 1M

GLM 4.6V is $0.43 cheaper per 1M input tokens (58.9% lower; 2.43x difference).

Cheaper output GLM 4.6V $3.49 vs $0.9 / 1M

GLM 4.6V is $2.59 cheaper per 1M output tokens (74.2% lower; 3.88x difference).

Larger context MoonshotAI Kimi Latest 262.14K vs 131.07K

MoonshotAI Kimi Latest has 131.07K more context (2x larger).

Sample workload GLM 4.6V $2.48 vs $0.75

GLM 4.6V is $1.73 cheaper on the standard workload (69.7% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
MoonshotAI Kimi Latest Calculating… Estimated API cost
GLM 4.6V Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

GLM 4.6V has the lower input price; GLM 4.6V has the lower output price; MoonshotAI Kimi Latest offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, GLM 4.6V is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $2.48 for MoonshotAI Kimi Latest and $0.75 for GLM 4.6V.

Best Fit

Choose MoonshotAI Kimi Latest when you care most about larger context window.

Choose GLM 4.6V when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 4.6V is estimated at $0.75 vs $2.48 for MoonshotAI Kimi Latest, saving $1.73 (69.7% lower).
  • GLM 4.6V is $1.73 cheaper on the standard workload (69.7% lower).
  • GLM 4.6V is $0.43 cheaper per 1M input tokens (58.9% lower; 2.43x difference).
  • GLM 4.6V is $2.59 cheaper per 1M output tokens (74.2% lower; 3.88x difference).
  • MoonshotAI Kimi Latest has 131.07K more context (2x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureNewMoonshotAI Kimi Latest
(MoonshotAI)
GLM 4.6V
(Z.ai)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$0.73$0.3
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$3.49$0.9
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$2.48$0.75
Context Window262.14K131.07K
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionGLM 4.6VOn the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, GLM 4.6V is estimated at $0.75 vs $2.48 for MoonshotAI Kimi Latest, saving $1.73 (69.7% lower).
High-volume input processingGLM 4.6VLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsGLM 4.6VLower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workMoonshotAI Kimi LatestA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • Kimi K2.5 can replace MoonshotAI Kimi Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.35.
  • Kimi K2 0711 can replace MoonshotAI Kimi Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.72.
  • Kimi K2 Thinking can replace MoonshotAI Kimi Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.85.
  • Kimi K2 0905 can replace MoonshotAI Kimi Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.85.
Larger context near this budget
Popular competitors
  • No popular competitor is currently available.

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

MoonshotAI catalog

Review all tracked MoonshotAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open MoonshotAI models

Z.ai catalog

Check other Z.ai models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Z.ai models
MoonshotAI Kimi Latest

This model always redirects to the latest model in the MoonshotAI Kimi family.

GLM 4.6V

GLM-4.6V is a large multimodal model designed for high-fidelity visual understanding and long-context reasoning across images, documents, and mixed media. It supports up to 128K tokens, processes complex page layouts...