Granite 4.0 Micro is $0.71 cheaper per 1M input tokens (97.7% lower; 42.9x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewMoonshotAI Kimi Latest vs Granite 4.0 Micro
Pick Granite 4.0 Micro for lower cost; pick MoonshotAI Kimi Latest only if the larger context window matters more.
Pricing data updated:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Granite 4.0 Micro for lower cost; pick MoonshotAI Kimi Latest only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Granite 4.0 Micro is estimated at $0.07 vs $2.48 for MoonshotAI Kimi Latest, saving $2.4 (97.1% lower).
Cost-first pickGranite 4.0 Micro
Context-first pickMoonshotAI Kimi Latest
Sample savings$2.497.1%
10x traffic gap$24.02
MoonshotAI Kimi Latest has more context, but Granite 4.0 Micro saves $2.4 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $24.02. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Granite 4.0 Micro stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | MoonshotAI Kimi Latest | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Granite 4.0 Micro | $5.39 | $0.14 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Granite 4.0 Micro | $4.22 | $0.13 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Granite 4.0 Micro | $18.18 | $0.58 |
Granite 4.0 Micro is $3.38 cheaper per 1M output tokens (96.8% lower; 31.2x difference).
MoonshotAI Kimi Latest has 131.14K more context (2x larger).
Granite 4.0 Micro is $2.4 cheaper on the standard workload (97.1% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Granite 4.0 Micro has the lower input price; Granite 4.0 Micro has the lower output price; MoonshotAI Kimi Latest offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $2.48 for MoonshotAI Kimi Latest and $0.07 for Granite 4.0 Micro.
Choose MoonshotAI Kimi Latest when you care most about larger context window.
Choose Granite 4.0 Micro when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Granite 4.0 Micro is estimated at $0.07 vs $2.48 for MoonshotAI Kimi Latest, saving $2.4 (97.1% lower).
- Granite 4.0 Micro is $2.4 cheaper on the standard workload (97.1% lower).
- Granite 4.0 Micro is $0.71 cheaper per 1M input tokens (97.7% lower; 42.9x difference).
- Granite 4.0 Micro is $3.38 cheaper per 1M output tokens (96.8% lower; 31.2x difference).
- MoonshotAI Kimi Latest has 131.14K more context (2x larger).
| Feature | NewMoonshotAI Kimi Latest (MoonshotAI) | Granite 4.0 Micro (IBM) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.73 | $0.017 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $3.49 | $0.112 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $2.48 | $0.07 |
| Context Window | 262.14K | 131K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Granite 4.0 Micro | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Granite 4.0 Micro is estimated at $0.07 vs $2.48 for MoonshotAI Kimi Latest, saving $2.4 (97.1% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Granite 4.0 Micro | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Granite 4.0 Micro | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | MoonshotAI Kimi Latest | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Kimi K2.5 can replace MoonshotAI Kimi Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.35.
- Kimi K2 0711 can replace MoonshotAI Kimi Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.72.
- Kimi K2 Thinking can replace MoonshotAI Kimi Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.85.
- Kimi K2 0905 can replace MoonshotAI Kimi Latest when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.85.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite offers 1.05M context with $1 sample workload cost.
- No popular competitor is currently available.
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsMoonshotAI catalog
Review all tracked MoonshotAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open MoonshotAI modelsIBM catalog
Check other IBM models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open IBM modelsThis model always redirects to the latest model in the MoonshotAI Kimi family.
Granite-4.0-H-Micro is a 3B parameter from the Granite 4 family of models. These models are the latest in a series of models released by IBM. They are fine-tuned for long...