API cost decision in 10 seconds

Kimi K2 0905 vs Gemma 3 12B

Pick Gemma 3 12B for lower cost; pick Kimi K2 0905 only if the larger context window matters more.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Gemma 3 12B for lower cost; pick Kimi K2 0905 only if the larger context window matters more.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemma 3 12B is estimated at $0.11 vs $1.85 for Kimi K2 0905, saving $1.75 (94.3% lower).

Cost-first pickGemma 3 12B
Context-first pickKimi K2 0905
Sample savings$1.7594.3%
10x traffic gap$17.45

Kimi K2 0905 has more context, but Gemma 3 12B saves $1.75 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $17.45. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

Gemma 3 12B stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickKimi K2 0905Gemma 3 12B
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputGemma 3 12B$4.25$0.27
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputGemma 3 12B$3.1$0.17
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputGemma 3 12B$13.1$0.69
Cheaper input Gemma 3 12B $0.6 vs $0.04 / 1M

Gemma 3 12B is $0.56 cheaper per 1M input tokens (93.3% lower; 15x difference).

Cheaper output Gemma 3 12B $2.5 vs $0.13 / 1M

Gemma 3 12B is $2.37 cheaper per 1M output tokens (94.8% lower; 19.2x difference).

Larger context Kimi K2 0905 262.14K vs 131.07K

Kimi K2 0905 has 131.07K more context (2x larger).

Sample workload Gemma 3 12B $1.85 vs $0.11

Gemma 3 12B is $1.75 cheaper on the standard workload (94.3% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
Kimi K2 0905 Calculating… Estimated API cost
Gemma 3 12B Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Gemma 3 12B has the lower input price; Gemma 3 12B has the lower output price; Kimi K2 0905 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Gemma 3 12B is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $1.85 for Kimi K2 0905 and $0.11 for Gemma 3 12B.

Best Fit

Choose Kimi K2 0905 when you care most about larger context window.

Choose Gemma 3 12B when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemma 3 12B is estimated at $0.11 vs $1.85 for Kimi K2 0905, saving $1.75 (94.3% lower).
  • Gemma 3 12B is $1.75 cheaper on the standard workload (94.3% lower).
  • Gemma 3 12B is $0.56 cheaper per 1M input tokens (93.3% lower; 15x difference).
  • Gemma 3 12B is $2.37 cheaper per 1M output tokens (94.8% lower; 19.2x difference).
  • Kimi K2 0905 has 131.07K more context (2x larger).
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureKimi K2 0905
(MoonshotAI)
Gemma 3 12B
(Google)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M
$0.6$0.04
Completion Price
per 1M tokens
$2.5$0.13
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output
$1.85$0.11
Context Window262.14K131.07K
Release Date
Popularity#70#123

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionGemma 3 12BOn the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemma 3 12B is estimated at $0.11 vs $1.85 for Kimi K2 0905, saving $1.75 (94.3% lower).
High-volume input processingGemma 3 12BLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsGemma 3 12BLower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workKimi K2 0905A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • Kimi K2.5 can replace Kimi K2 0905 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.35.
  • Kimi K2 0711 can replace Kimi K2 0905 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $1.72.
  • Gemma 4 31B (free) can replace Gemma 3 12B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
  • Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) can replace Gemma 3 12B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
Larger context near this budget

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

MoonshotAI catalog

Review all tracked MoonshotAI models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open MoonshotAI models

Google catalog

Check other Google models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Google models
Kimi K2 0905

Kimi K2 0905 is the September update of [Kimi K2 0711](moonshotai/kimi-k2). It is a large-scale Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language model developed by Moonshot AI, featuring 1 trillion total parameters with 32...

Gemma 3 12B

Gemma 3 introduces multimodality, supporting vision-language input and text outputs. It handles context windows up to 128k tokens, understands over 140 languages, and offers improved math, reasoning, and chat capabilities,...