Mistral Nemo is $0.03 cheaper per 1M input tokens (60% lower; 2.5x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Mistral Nemo vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Pick Mistral Nemo for lower cost; pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Mistral Nemo for lower cost; pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Mistral Nemo is estimated at $0.04 vs $0.15 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, saving $0.12 (76.7% lower).
Cost-first pickMistral Nemo
Context-first pickNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Sample savings$0.1276.7%
10x traffic gap$1.15
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has more context, but Mistral Nemo saves $0.12 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $1.15. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Mistral Nemo stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Mistral Nemo | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Mistral Nemo | $0.12 | $0.35 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Mistral Nemo | $0.05 | $0.25 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Mistral Nemo | $0.17 | $1.05 |
Mistral Nemo is $0.17 cheaper per 1M output tokens (85% lower; 6.67x difference).
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has 131.07K more context (2x larger).
Mistral Nemo is $0.12 cheaper on the standard workload (76.7% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Mistral Nemo has the lower input price; Mistral Nemo has the lower output price; Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Mistral Nemo is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.04 for Mistral Nemo and $0.15 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B.
Choose Mistral Nemo when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
Choose Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B when you care most about larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Mistral Nemo is estimated at $0.04 vs $0.15 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, saving $0.12 (76.7% lower).
- Mistral Nemo is $0.12 cheaper on the standard workload (76.7% lower).
- Mistral Nemo is $0.03 cheaper per 1M input tokens (60% lower; 2.5x difference).
- Mistral Nemo is $0.17 cheaper per 1M output tokens (85% lower; 6.67x difference).
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has 131.07K more context (2x larger).
| Feature | Mistral Nemo (Mistral) | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (NVIDIA) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.02 | $0.05 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.03 | $0.2 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.04 | $0.15 |
| Context Window | 131.07K | 262.14K |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #34 | #95 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Mistral Nemo | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Mistral Nemo is estimated at $0.04 vs $0.15 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, saving $0.12 (76.7% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Mistral Nemo | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Mistral Nemo | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Nemotron 3 Super (free) can replace Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (free) can replace Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) can replace Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (free) can replace Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- Lyria 3 Clip Preview offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- Lyria 3 Pro Preview offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsMistral catalog
Review all tracked Mistral models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Mistral modelsNVIDIA catalog
Check other NVIDIA models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open NVIDIA modelsA 12B parameter model with a 128k token context length built by Mistral in collaboration with NVIDIA. The model is multilingual, supporting English, French, German, Spanish, Italian, Portuguese, Chinese, Japanese,...
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is a small language MoE model with highest compute efficiency and accuracy for developers to build specialized agentic AI systems. The model is fully...