API cost decision in 10 seconds

NewMistral Medium 3.5 vs NewMoonshotAI Kimi Latest

Pick MoonshotAI Kimi Latest when budget is the priority.

Page updated:  Data confirmed:  Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick MoonshotAI Kimi Latest when budget is the priority.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, MoonshotAI Kimi Latest is estimated at $2.48 vs $5.25 for Mistral Medium 3.5, saving $2.77 (52.9% lower).

Cost-first pickMoonshotAI Kimi Latest
Context-first pickBoth models
Sample savings$2.7752.9%
10x traffic gap$27.75

The reported context window is tied, so cost and provider fit carry more weight. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $27.75. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cost sensitivity

Workload Sensitivity

Same prices, different token mixes.

MoonshotAI Kimi Latest stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.

Workload shapeToken mixBetter pickMistral Medium 3.5MoonshotAI Kimi Latest
Input-heavy / RAG5M input + 500K outputMoonshotAI Kimi Latest$11.25$5.39
Balanced workload1M input + 1M outputMoonshotAI Kimi Latest$9$4.22
Output-heavy chatbot1M input + 5M outputMoonshotAI Kimi Latest$39$18.18
Cheaper input MoonshotAI Kimi Latest $1.5 vs $0.73 / 1M

MoonshotAI Kimi Latest is $0.77 cheaper per 1M input tokens (51.3% lower; 2.05x difference).

Cheaper output MoonshotAI Kimi Latest $7.5 vs $3.49 / 1M

MoonshotAI Kimi Latest is $4.01 cheaper per 1M output tokens (53.5% lower; 2.15x difference).

Larger context Tie 262.14K vs 262.14K

Both models report the same context window at 262.14K tokens.

Sample workload MoonshotAI Kimi Latest $5.25 vs $2.48

MoonshotAI Kimi Latest is $2.77 cheaper on the standard workload (52.9% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.
Mistral Medium 3.5 Calculating… Estimated API cost
MoonshotAI Kimi Latest Calculating… Estimated API cost
Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

MoonshotAI Kimi Latest has the lower input price; MoonshotAI Kimi Latest has the lower output price; both models report the same context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, MoonshotAI Kimi Latest is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $5.25 for Mistral Medium 3.5 and $2.48 for MoonshotAI Kimi Latest.

Best Fit

Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.

Choose MoonshotAI Kimi Latest when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.

Decision Notes
  • On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, MoonshotAI Kimi Latest is estimated at $2.48 vs $5.25 for Mistral Medium 3.5, saving $2.77 (52.9% lower).
  • MoonshotAI Kimi Latest is $2.77 cheaper on the standard workload (52.9% lower).
  • MoonshotAI Kimi Latest is $0.77 cheaper per 1M input tokens (51.3% lower; 2.05x difference).
  • MoonshotAI Kimi Latest is $4.01 cheaper per 1M output tokens (53.5% lower; 2.15x difference).
  • Both models report the same context window at 262.14K tokens.
Head-to-Head Specs
FeatureNewMistral Medium 3.5
(Mistral)		NewMoonshotAI Kimi Latest
(MoonshotAI)
Input Price
prompt tokens per 1M		$1.5$0.73
Completion Price
per 1M tokens		$7.5$3.49
Sample Workload Cost
1M input + 500K output		$5.25$2.48
Context Window262.14K262.14K
Release Date

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use caseBetter pickWhy
Budget-constrained productionMoonshotAI Kimi LatestOn the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, MoonshotAI Kimi Latest is estimated at $2.48 vs $5.25 for Mistral Medium 3.5, saving $2.77 (52.9% lower).
High-volume input processingMoonshotAI Kimi LatestLower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbotsMoonshotAI Kimi LatestLower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document workTieA larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps
  • Mistral Nemo can replace Mistral Medium 3.5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.04.
  • Mistral Small 3 can replace Mistral Medium 3.5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.09.
  • Ministral 3 3B 2512 can replace Mistral Medium 3.5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.15.
  • Mistral Small 3.2 24B can replace Mistral Medium 3.5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.17.
Larger context near this budget

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

Mistral catalog

Review all tracked Mistral models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open Mistral models

MoonshotAI catalog

Check other MoonshotAI models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open MoonshotAI models
Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral Medium 3.5 is a dense 128B instruction-following model from Mistral AI. It supports text and image inputs with text output, and is designed for agentic workflows, coding, and complex...

MoonshotAI Kimi Latest

This model always redirects to the latest model in the MoonshotAI Kimi family.