Gemini 2.5 Pro is $0.25 cheaper per 1M input tokens (16.7% lower; 1.2x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewMistral Medium 3.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Pick Mistral Medium 3.5 for lower cost; pick Gemini 2.5 Pro only if the larger context window matters more.
Page updated:
Data confirmed:
Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens
Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output
Budget verdict
Pick Mistral Medium 3.5 for lower cost; pick Gemini 2.5 Pro only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Mistral Medium 3.5 is estimated at $5.25 vs $6.25 for Gemini 2.5 Pro, saving $1 (16% lower).
Cost-first pickMistral Medium 3.5
Context-first pickGemini 2.5 Pro
Sample savings$116%
10x traffic gap$10
Gemini 2.5 Pro has more context, but Mistral Medium 3.5 saves $1 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $10. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors Tie, balanced workload favors Mistral Medium 3.5, and output-heavy chatbot favors Mistral Medium 3.5.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Tie | $11.25 | $11.25 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Mistral Medium 3.5 | $9 | $11.25 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Mistral Medium 3.5 | $39 | $51.25 |
Mistral Medium 3.5 is $2.5 cheaper per 1M output tokens (25% lower; 1.33x difference).
Gemini 2.5 Pro has 786.43K more context (4x larger).
Mistral Medium 3.5 is $1 cheaper on the standard workload (16% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Gemini 2.5 Pro has the lower input price; Mistral Medium 3.5 has the lower output price; Gemini 2.5 Pro offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Mistral Medium 3.5 is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $5.25 for Mistral Medium 3.5 and $6.25 for Gemini 2.5 Pro.
Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 when you care most about lower output-token price.
Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro when you care most about lower input-token price, and larger context window.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Mistral Medium 3.5 is estimated at $5.25 vs $6.25 for Gemini 2.5 Pro, saving $1 (16% lower).
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is $1 cheaper on the standard workload (16% lower).
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is $0.25 cheaper per 1M input tokens (16.7% lower; 1.2x difference).
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is $2.5 cheaper per 1M output tokens (25% lower; 1.33x difference).
- Gemini 2.5 Pro has 786.43K more context (4x larger).
| Feature | NewMistral Medium 3.5 (Mistral) | Gemini 2.5 Pro (Google) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $1.5 | $1.25 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $7.5 | $10 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $5.25 | $6.25 |
| Context Window | 262.14K | 1.05M |
| Release Date | ||
| Popularity | #47 | #55 |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Mistral Medium 3.5 | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Mistral Medium 3.5 is estimated at $5.25 vs $6.25 for Gemini 2.5 Pro, saving $1 (16% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Gemini 2.5 Pro | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Mistral Nemo can replace Mistral Medium 3.5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.04.
- Mistral Small 3 can replace Mistral Medium 3.5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.09.
- Ministral 3 3B 2512 can replace Mistral Medium 3.5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.15.
- Mistral Small 3.2 24B can replace Mistral Medium 3.5 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.17.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $5 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
- Claude Opus 4.7 · Anthropic · #3
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsMistral catalog
Review all tracked Mistral models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Mistral modelsGoogle catalog
Check other Google models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Google modelsMistral Medium 3.5 is a dense 128B instruction-following model from Mistral AI. It supports text and image inputs with text output, and is designed for agentic workflows, coding, and complex...
Gemini 2.5 Pro is Google’s state-of-the-art AI model designed for advanced reasoning, coding, mathematics, and scientific tasks. It employs “thinking” capabilities, enabling it to reason through responses with enhanced accuracy...