Mistral Large 4 is $0.57 cheaper per 1M input tokens (45.6% lower; 1.84x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
NewMistral Large 4 vs Muse Spark 1.3
Pick Mistral Large 4 when budget is the priority.
Budget verdict
Pick Mistral Large 4 when budget is the priority.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Mistral Large 4 is estimated at $1.73 vs $3.38 for Muse Spark 1.3, saving $1.65 (48.9% lower).
The reported context window is tied, so cost and provider fit carry more weight. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $16.5. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Mistral Large 4 stays cheaper across input-heavy, balanced, and output-heavy sample workloads.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Mistral Large 4 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Mistral Large 4 | $4.45 | $8.38 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Mistral Large 4 | $2.77 | $5.5 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Mistral Large 4 | $11.13 | $22.5 |
Mistral Large 4 is $2.16 cheaper per 1M output tokens (50.8% lower; 2.03x difference).
Both models report the same context window at 1.05M tokens.
Mistral Large 4 is $1.65 cheaper on the standard workload (48.9% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Mistral Large 4 has the lower input price; Mistral Large 4 has the lower output price; both models report the same context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Mistral Large 4 is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $1.73 for Mistral Large 4 and $3.38 for Muse Spark 1.3.
Choose Mistral Large 4 when you care most about lower input-token price, and lower output-token price.
Choose Muse Spark 1.3 when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Mistral Large 4 is estimated at $1.73 vs $3.38 for Muse Spark 1.3, saving $1.65 (48.9% lower).
- Mistral Large 4 is $1.65 cheaper on the standard workload (48.9% lower).
- Mistral Large 4 is $0.57 cheaper per 1M input tokens (45.6% lower; 1.84x difference).
- Mistral Large 4 is $2.16 cheaper per 1M output tokens (50.8% lower; 2.03x difference).
- Both models report the same context window at 1.05M tokens.
| Feature | NewMistral Large 4 (Mistral) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Meta) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.68 | $1.25 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $2.09 | $4.25 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $1.73 | $3.38 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Mistral Large 4 | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Mistral Large 4 is estimated at $1.73 vs $3.38 for Muse Spark 1.3, saving $1.65 (48.9% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Mistral Large 4 | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Mistral Large 4 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Tie | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Mistral Nemo can replace Mistral Large 4 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.04.
- Mistral Small 3 can replace Mistral Large 4 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.09.
- Ministral 3 8B 2512 (batch) can replace Mistral Large 4 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.11.
- Ministral 3 3B 2512 can replace Mistral Large 4 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.15.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Grok 4.20 offers 2M context with $2.5 sample workload cost.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 1.31M context with $0.47 sample workload cost.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.28 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
- Step 5 Preview · StepFun · #2
- GLM 5.3 Flash · Z.ai · #3
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash · Xiaomi · #4
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsMistral catalog
Review all tracked Mistral models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Mistral modelsMeta catalog
Check other Meta models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.
Open Meta modelsMistral Large 4 is a frontier multimodal (text and image input) model from Mistral AI built for reasoning, coding, and agentic workloads. It offers a 1M-token context window with up...
Muse Spark 1.3 is a multimodal reasoning model from Meta for long-running agentic, multi-agent, and coding workflows. It is designed to keep track of information across extended tasks, work through...