Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is $0.1 cheaper per 1M input tokens (50% lower; 2x difference).
API cost decision in 10 seconds
Ministral 3 14B 2512 vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507
Pick Voxtral Small 24B 2507 for lower cost; pick Ministral 3 14B 2512 only if the larger context window matters more.
Budget verdict
Pick Voxtral Small 24B 2507 for lower cost; pick Ministral 3 14B 2512 only if the larger context window matters more.
On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is estimated at $0.25 vs $0.3 for Ministral 3 14B 2512, saving $0.05 (16.7% lower).
Ministral 3 14B 2512 has more context, but Voxtral Small 24B 2507 saves $0.05 on the standard workload. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $0.5. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.
Cost sensitivity
Workload Sensitivity
Cost winner changes by workload shape: input-heavy / RAG favors Voxtral Small 24B 2507, balanced workload favors Tie, and output-heavy chatbot favors Ministral 3 14B 2512.
| Workload shape | Token mix | Better pick | Ministral 3 14B 2512 | Voxtral Small 24B 2507 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input-heavy / RAG | 5M input + 500K output | Voxtral Small 24B 2507 | $1.1 | $0.65 |
| Balanced workload | 1M input + 1M output | Tie | $0.4 | $0.4 |
| Output-heavy chatbot | 1M input + 5M output | Ministral 3 14B 2512 | $1.2 | $1.6 |
Ministral 3 14B 2512 is $0.1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (33.3% lower; 1.5x difference).
Ministral 3 14B 2512 has 230.14K more context (8.19x larger).
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is $0.05 cheaper on the standard workload (16.7% lower).
Estimate your workload cost
Your Workload Cost
This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.
Quick Decision
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has the lower input price; Ministral 3 14B 2512 has the lower output price; Ministral 3 14B 2512 offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is cheaper for the standard workload.
For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.3 for Ministral 3 14B 2512 and $0.25 for Voxtral Small 24B 2507.
Choose Ministral 3 14B 2512 when you care most about lower output-token price, and larger context window.
Choose Voxtral Small 24B 2507 when you care most about lower input-token price.
- On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is estimated at $0.25 vs $0.3 for Ministral 3 14B 2512, saving $0.05 (16.7% lower).
- Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is $0.05 cheaper on the standard workload (16.7% lower).
- Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is $0.1 cheaper per 1M input tokens (50% lower; 2x difference).
- Ministral 3 14B 2512 is $0.1 cheaper per 1M output tokens (33.3% lower; 1.5x difference).
- Ministral 3 14B 2512 has 230.14K more context (8.19x larger).
| Feature | Ministral 3 14B 2512 (Mistral) | Voxtral Small 24B 2507 (Mistral) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price prompt tokens per 1M | $0.2 | $0.1 |
| Completion Price per 1M tokens | $0.2 | $0.3 |
| Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output | $0.3 | $0.25 |
| Context Window | 262.14K | 32K |
| Release Date |
Use-Case Decision Matrix
| Use case | Better pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-constrained production | Voxtral Small 24B 2507 | On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is estimated at $0.25 vs $0.3 for Ministral 3 14B 2512, saving $0.05 (16.7% lower). |
| High-volume input processing | Voxtral Small 24B 2507 | Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill. |
| Long responses and chatbots | Ministral 3 14B 2512 | Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens. |
| RAG or long-document work | Ministral 3 14B 2512 | A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files. |
Related Alternatives
- Mistral Nemo can replace Ministral 3 14B 2512 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.04.
- Mistral Small 3 can replace Ministral 3 14B 2512 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.09.
- Ministral 3 3B 2512 can replace Ministral 3 14B 2512 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.15.
- Mistral Small 3.2 24B can replace Ministral 3 14B 2512 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.17.
- Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
- Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.2 sample workload cost.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (free) offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
- No popular competitor is currently available.
Cheaper alternatives
Review low-cost models sorted by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.
Open cheapest modelsLarger context alternatives
Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.
Open largest context modelsProvider catalogs
Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.
Open provider hubsMistral catalog
Review all tracked Mistral models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.
Open Mistral modelsThe largest model in the Ministral 3 family, Ministral 3 14B offers frontier capabilities and performance comparable to its larger Mistral Small 3.2 24B counterpart. A powerful and efficient language...
Voxtral Small is an enhancement of Mistral Small 3, incorporating state-of-the-art audio input capabilities while retaining best-in-class text performance. It excels at speech transcription, translation and audio understanding. Input audio...