API cost decision in 10 seconds

🔥MiniMax M2.7 vs 🔥Gemma 4 31B

Pick Gemma 4 31B when budget and context both matter.

Pricing data updated: 2026-05-17T02:07:32Z Prices normalized to USD per 1M tokens Sample workload: 1M input + 500K output

Budget verdict

Pick Gemma 4 31B when budget and context both matter.

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemma 4 31B is estimated at $0.3 vs $0.88 for MiniMax M2.7, saving $0.57 (65.3% lower).

Cost-first pickGemma 4 31B

Context-first pickGemma 4 31B

Sample savings$0.5765.3%

10x traffic gap$5.74

Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on the standard workload and also has the larger context window. At 10x that traffic, the same price gap is about $5.74. Use the calculator below to replace the sample workload with your own token volume.

Cheaper input Gemma 4 31B $0.279 vs $0.12 / 1M

Gemma 4 31B is $0.16 cheaper per 1M input tokens (57% lower; 2.33x difference).

Cheaper output Gemma 4 31B $1.2 vs $0.37 / 1M

Gemma 4 31B is $0.83 cheaper per 1M output tokens (69.2% lower; 3.24x difference).

Larger context Gemma 4 31B 204.8K vs 262.14K

Gemma 4 31B has 57.34K more context (1.28x larger).

Sample workload Gemma 4 31B $0.88 vs $0.3

Gemma 4 31B is $0.57 cheaper on the standard workload (65.3% lower).

Estimate your workload cost

Your Workload Cost

Prices are normalized to USD per 1M tokens.

Monthly input tokens Monthly output tokens

MiniMax M2.7 Calculating… Estimated API cost

Gemma 4 31B Calculating… Estimated API cost

Cheaper for this workload Calculating… Difference: calculating…

This estimate uses normalized public API pricing per 1M tokens. It is a planning aid, not a billing quote. Verify provider pricing, limits, and terms before production use.

Quick Decision

Verdict

Gemma 4 31B has the lower input price; Gemma 4 31B has the lower output price; Gemma 4 31B offers the larger context window. For the 1M input plus 500K output sample, Gemma 4 31B is cheaper for the standard workload.

For a 1M input token plus 500K output token workload, the estimated API cost is $0.88 for MiniMax M2.7 and $0.3 for Gemma 4 31B.

Best Fit

Choose MiniMax M2.7 when its provider, model quality, latency, or availability is more important than the numeric price/context winner.

Choose Gemma 4 31B when you care most about lower input-token price, lower output-token price, and larger context window.

Decision Notes

On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemma 4 31B is estimated at $0.3 vs $0.88 for MiniMax M2.7, saving $0.57 (65.3% lower).
Gemma 4 31B is $0.57 cheaper on the standard workload (65.3% lower).
Gemma 4 31B is $0.16 cheaper per 1M input tokens (57% lower; 2.33x difference).
Gemma 4 31B is $0.83 cheaper per 1M output tokens (69.2% lower; 3.24x difference).
Gemma 4 31B has 57.34K more context (1.28x larger).

Head-to-Head Specs

Feature	🔥MiniMax M2.7 (MiniMax)	🔥Gemma 4 31B (Google)
Input Price prompt tokens per 1M	$0.279	$0.12
Completion Price per 1M tokens	$1.2	$0.37
Sample Workload Cost 1M input + 500K output	$0.88	$0.3
Context Window	204.8K	262.14K
Release Date	2026-03-18	2026-04-02
Popularity Rank current rank	#10	#18

Use-Case Decision Matrix

Use case	Better pick	Why
Budget-constrained production	Gemma 4 31B	On the standard 1M input plus 500K output workload, Gemma 4 31B is estimated at $0.3 vs $0.88 for MiniMax M2.7, saving $0.57 (65.3% lower).
High-volume input processing	Gemma 4 31B	Lower prompt-token price matters most when prompts, retrieved passages, or documents dominate the bill.
Long responses and chatbots	Gemma 4 31B	Lower output-token price matters most when assistants generate many completion tokens.
RAG or long-document work	Gemma 4 31B	A larger context window leaves more room for retrieved passages, conversation history, or source files.

Related Alternatives

Same-provider lower-cost swaps

MiniMax M2.5 (free) can replace MiniMax M2.7 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.
MiniMax M2.5 can replace MiniMax M2.7 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.72.
MiniMax-01 can replace MiniMax M2.7 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.75.
MiniMax M2 can replace MiniMax M2.7 when lower sample workload cost matters most: $0.76.

Larger context near this budget

Llama 4 Scout offers 10M context with $0.23 sample workload cost.
Owl Alpha offers 1.05M context with $0 sample workload cost.
DeepSeek V4 Flash offers 1.05M context with $0.22 sample workload cost.
DeepSeek V4 Pro offers 1.05M context with $0.87 sample workload cost.

Popular competitors

DeepSeek V4 Flash · DeepSeek · #1
Hy3 preview · Tencent · #2
Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · #3
Owl Alpha · OpenRouter · #4

Cheaper alternatives

Review low-cost models ranked by a standard 1M input plus 500K output workload.

Open cheapest models

Larger context alternatives

Find models with larger context windows for RAG, long documents, and codebase review.

Open largest context models

Provider catalogs

Compare models within provider hubs before choosing a final API vendor.

Open provider hubs

MiniMax catalog

Review all tracked MiniMax models before deciding whether this matchup is the right shortlist.

Open MiniMax models

Google catalog

Check other Google models with comparable pricing, context, or release timing.

Open Google models

MiniMax M2.7

MiniMax-M2.7 is a next-generation large language model designed for autonomous, real-world productivity and continuous improvement. Built to actively participate in its own evolution, M2.7 integrates advanced agentic capabilities through multi-agent...

Gemma 4 31B

Gemma 4 31B Instruct is Google DeepMind's 30.7B dense multimodal model supporting text and image input with text output. Features a 256K token context window, configurable thinking/reasoning mode, native function...